Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forgotten Cats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forgotten Cats

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A small (revenues under $1M/year per [1]) local charity doing excellent work that appears to fail WP:NORG. There is some coverage in The Times Herald, a small local paper (e.g., [2], [3]), but I'm not finding non-WP:ROUTINE coverage that clears WP:AUD requirements. Tagged for notability for over a decade. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:31, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:31, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:31, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:31, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agreed, this fails WP:AUD ... too many of the references are primary. -- Whiteguru (talk) 11:44, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails AUD, too few quality sources. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 01:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.