Talk:List of AR platform cartridges

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 March 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

Firearms List‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lists List‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Multiple issues

No sources, no notability. Felsic2 (talk) 17:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then bring the page up for deletion.--RAF910 (talk) 17:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Later, perhaps. Let's see if it can be fixed first. Felsic2 (talk) 18:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are three paths to take for this page. One is to merge it with another page. The second is to find the relevant WP pages and give them relevant categories (e.g. AR-Rimfire). The third is to footnote it all. As it appears there are some that are linked, perhaps categories is the happier path --Dausha (talk) 18:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sourcing

Let's be realistic here. The lack of sourcing here is problematic. The AfD ended in a keep, but that didn't absolve us from needing sources. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:02, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced content in references section

This was in the wrong section and totally unsourced, possibly even signed (GLS):

BHW designated chamberings based on the 6.8 SPC and the 6.5 Grendel were developed by Black Hole Weaponry using their own reamer designs. As they are non-SAAMI cartridges some confusion may exist as each manufacturer makes changes in their own designs that while identically named they are actually different in specifications. GLS

Moving here for improvement before being returned to an appropriate section. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 16:43, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned in December, the sourcing here needs a lot of work. I'm not keen on some of the sources that are being used, including small manufacturers and at least 1 book that looks like a self-pub. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:52, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This page is underutilized

The various pages for specific AR platform cartridges link haphazardly and incompletely to each other. For example, 6mm AR links to 6mm Optimum and .223 Remington, while 6mm ARC links to 6mm Optimum, .223 Remington, .224 Valkyrie and 6mm AR. Meanwhile .223 Remington "See Also" links only to 6×45mm, Delta L problem and some pages of very general interest.

Trying to maintain links to AR platform concepts on every AR platform cartridge page would be a maintenance nightmare. It would seem far more practical for each of them to link to this page, which should link to all of those (including Delta L problem, which needs to be added).

Does anyone have suggestions, protests or blessings regarding this? I'm willing to do the work given some assurances that it wouldn't get reverted offhand.

TTK (talk) 23:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]