User talk:MrOllie

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Please explain yourself about this

Why did you nullified my edit to Mikraot Gedolot?, I don't want an edit war, but we have to sort this out, I'm waiting for your reply sir. 190.219.183.161 (talk) 20:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

You added a bookstore link to the article. - MrOllie (talk) 20:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

You're right, but it's that forbidden by Wikipedia? Alternatively, you can add that version without the link. 190.219.183.161 (talk) 20:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

See WP:ELNO. We don't add hotlinks to stores. - MrOllie (talk) 20:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

I understand... Can I add the name of the edition without the webstore link? 190.219.183.161 (talk) 20:35, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

List of tools for static code analysis

MrOllie, I'm reasonably new at making Wikipedia edits and saw you reverted my Semgrep entry with the message "Not notable". What would be the proper method for integrating Semgrep to this page? I am currently working to get the Semgrep Wikipedia page built, if the lack of an independent page was the reason for removal. Thanks in advance! - AzureUmbra (talk) 23:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

That's a list of software that already has a Wikipedia page and/or has established notability. It would need the same set of independent, reliable sources that an article would need. - MrOllie (talk) 23:57, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Eelume

You deleted my friend's entire wikipedia edit about the eelume and I was wondering why? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikieditor2020c (talk • contribs) 01:31, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Because he turned it into an advertisement. See WP:NPOV. - MrOllie (talk) 01:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Sophistical citizen

I'm just trying to understand from what time relevant links started to mark as "inappropriate external links." Maybe you've been confused because I added a private company next to educational and free organizations? If so, feel free to delete; if not, please explain why it's inappropriate. Thanks --Sophistical citizen (talk) 19:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Local plumbers are 'relevant' to Plumbing, but you'll notice that article is not full of external links to plumbing companies. We do not add links to companies like that, nor do we use their marketing blogs as references. - MrOllie (talk) 20:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

That's weird as I don't understand what means 'companies like that', and also, I saw tons of links to commercial companies in Wikipedia. Plumbers example are pretty straight but plumbing and the whole internet scanning is a bit different things. It's not many companies that do something like that and work with IETF instead of earning money. I believe that it worth it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophistical citizen (talk • contribs) 08:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

If you have found other inappropriate links, that is a reason to fix those links, not to add more inappropriate links. - MrOllie (talk) 13:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Ok. Validate it for the last time. I can put links only for non-profit organizations/companies and all links to commercial companies will be regarded as inappropriate; if it's not in the companie's Wikipedia page. Right? Sophistical citizen (talk) 16:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed draft for your consideration

Hi. My name is Sang Ngo and I work for Foundation Capital. I proposed a draft replacement for the current article on the Talk page that addresses the citations needed tag, removes promotion, and improves the quality of the page. That was a month ago and so far there has been no response. I was wondering if you would be willing to take a look? Sangatfoundationcap (talk) 23:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)\

It is in the queue for such changes, which is backlogged. Have patience. - MrOllie (talk) 13:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting milw0rm vandalism

Thanks for undoing the edits by Whhacc. Keystroke (talk) 00:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

You removed my edit AND reinstated bullshit that should not be there.

I noticed that you removed my edit of the page "Hubris", stating that it does not have "reliable source". That, however, does not mean it is wrong. And if there is no indication of it being wrong, it is too much to remove it.

Also, in my two edits of this page, i removed some statement ("is like a zero-sum game") that is not true and not relevant, and your edit put that back. That is completely wrong.

So you seem to be behaving as someone who has more right to determine what should be on wikipedia than others. Do you have any special affiliation with wikipedia or have you appointed yourself as arbiter of whether users can add useful content ?

In the meantime, i'm restoring that article to my latest version, because the result of your action is re-adding bullshit and the reasons provided for deleting my contribution are insufficient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SiwardDeGroot (talk • contribs) 15:46, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Sourcing is required on Wikipedia. It is not a place for you to write whatever you think is correct. See Wikipedia:No original research. MrOllie (talk) 15:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

The nonsense that you re-added has no source either. Please stop fucking up valid contributions.