Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The British Theatre Guide (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Barkeep49 (talk | contribs) at 17:52, 21 November 2020 (The British Theatre Guide: Closed as soft delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:52, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The British Theatre Guide (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NC in 2014, but no evidence in the intervening six years that this is a notable website or theatre guide. StarM 18:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. StarM 18:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. StarM 18:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. StarM 18:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:34, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Could be one of many websites... Nothing about it from neutral third-party sources. Having a website for 20+ years isn't notable, you simply keep paying the domain registrar. Would need a write-up in a newspaper or some such thing about it. Oaktree b (talk) 19:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clarkcj12 (talk) 05:58, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.