User talk:Sxologist

Archives

Great job on fixing the articles on conversion therapy!

Just wanted to drop by and say I appreciate your work undoing the contributions made by Skoojal/Freeknowledgecreator. His articles were clearly violating WP:Fringe and trying to make conversion therapy look like a scientifically valid practice, with the only reviews in the "Reception" sections being positive or neutral ones. I'm glad someone who's better at editing Wikipedia articles than I am is fixing these biased articles! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dustytumble (talk • contribs) 18:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dustytumble: thank you, much appreciated. I wish I had more time to edit on Wikipedia, but even small adjustments can improve articles. Sxologist (talk) 21:58, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The Psychology Barnstar
		For your excellent work improving psychology-related articles, particularly in correcting erroneous or misleading information regarding conversion therapy. Great job! Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/his/him] 19:04, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mark! Sxologist (talk) 22:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ivanka Savic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quillette

Hi. I have requested a formal closure for the RfC that resulted from the WP:RSN discussion you created on 9 August 2020 . Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 12:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zenomonoz, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

gnu 57 07:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Our interactions

If you are allowed to keep editing, I'm willing to start over. And, after all, our interactions haven't been too bad. Just a little heated a couple of times. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 20:17, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, three times when including the SPI. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 20:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Flyer, of course. I don’t expect I will be able to keep editing and I accept that if that’s the decision. Thanks for leaving a comment. Sxologist (talk) 20:38, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are indefinitely blocked, there is the WP:Standard offer, like Beyond My Ken mentioned. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 20:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, that sounds okay. Sxologist (talk) 20:54, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Blank Slate, second edition.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Blank Slate, second edition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question

hi @Flyer22 Frozen: I'm not sure if you are the correct person to ask – but am I allowed to contribute to Simple Wikipedia during my block? I saw that on WP:OFFER, users are encouraged to contribute to other WMF projects if they are interested in appealing a block, so I have done some contributions on Wikiquote. Not sure if simple wiki qualifies as english wikipedia though. Thanks. Sxologist (talk) 00:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]