User talk:Roscelese
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Mona Eltahawy
Do you want to mediate or arbitrate this dispute? I'd also like to talk about what I noticed on ISI.org/Chauvinism page. I think we are supposed to start with mediation first.
So...would you like to discuss?
I just looked over some other disputes - some related - some unrelated to you. I would like to try the Moderated Discussion but if their aren't enough volunteers then we could do 3rd Opinion unless you think we can figure something out together through just us having a discussion - just not sure it isn't already beyond that point for you. I'm definitely down to talk about though. Please let me know.
GhostsOfGironde (talk) 09:12, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
February 2016 – Discretionary Sanctions/Alert (topic=ab) – abortion
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Abortion, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.False accusation of rape article
Catholic Church and homosexuality
July 2020
Hello, I'm Sorinam. I noticed your changing some of my edits content from Sexual abuse cases in Brooklyn's Haredi community without explaining why. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sorinam (talk) 22 July 2020 (UTC)
About PROD
It was a bit rude to add a PROD to the article, like, right after I made it without discussing things with me first, but hopefully I can convince you that it is in fact notable. You said it has just trivial mentions but in fact there exists an entire article about it. There are a couple more that are also entirely about the Smart Pistol, such as one discussing its similarity to a real weapon and whether it is coming to Apex Legends. With that, plus all the mentions in reviews I am pretty well convinced it passes GNG.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Zxcvbnm: I read your citations, I just disagreed that they supported its claim to notability. This could be discussed in the Titanfall article. "This element of the game was mentioned in many reviews of the game" is absolutely not a claim to separate notability. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Please stop reverting edits to the Antifeminism article. The content that was removed is offensive and sexually explicit, it has no place on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.138.224.140 (talk) 20:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
You wrote this--thank you! Next step, a historical marker. If we could figure out where she was born in Montgomery, or where she lived... Drmies (talk) 17:21, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
And maybe you have an opinion on the IP's recent category edits. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC)