User talk:Woodstock2010
Regarding your edit to Circumcision:
Your recent edit to Circumcision (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 07:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced material to this article. It doesn't matter if it's true or not without references. --Onorem 07:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Adding (see Sex: A Guide) to the middle of your statement doesn't make it referenced. Unfortunately, I can't revert again without breaking the Three-revert rule. Hopefully, someone else will take care of it soon. You need to provide a reliable source. --Onorem 07:23, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Please read WP:CIVIL and WP:VERIFY. It seems you could learn from both of them. Your personal experiences with men don't count as a reliable source. --Onorem 07:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 07:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Here's a couple more links for you. Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words, Wikipedia:No personal attacks
Even if you just want to say that it is believed by some, you need to provide a source. Your personal attacks are out of line. --Onorem 07:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, your edits are speculative and/or constitute original research and cannot be included. Please cite your edits with a reliable source, one that is verifiable. Thank you. Gzkn 08:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Jakew 12:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Blocked 31H
You have been blocked 31H for edit warring and WP:3RR violation.--CSTAR 18:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Woodstock2010 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 24.28.143.218 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Woodstock2010". The reason given for Woodstock2010's block is: "Aggressive edit warring 3RR vio".
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —Pilotguy (ptt) 21:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Unblock
Woodstock2010 (block log • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))
IP address: 24.28.143.218 (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock • checkuser (log))
Blocking admin: CSTAR (talk • blocks)
Block message:
WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} instead.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Woodstock2010}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:
{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=CSTAR | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Woodstock2010". The reason given for Woodstock2010's block is: "Aggressive edit warring 3RR vio".</nowiki> | 3=24.28.143.218 | 4= | 5=~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here with any specific rationale. If the decline= parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.
{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=24.28.143.218 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Woodstock2010". The reason given for Woodstock2010's block is: "Aggressive edit warring 3RR vio".</nowiki> | 3=CSTAR | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=24.28.143.218 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Woodstock2010". The reason given for Woodstock2010's block is: "Aggressive edit warring 3RR vio".</nowiki> | 3=CSTAR | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}