Jump to content

User talk:Sandstein

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lunyaah (talk | contribs) at 18:37, 5 January 2021 (Notification: listing of 9MOTHER9HORSE9EYES9 at WP:Articles for deletion.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my talk page!

Please place new messages at the bottom of this page, or click here to start a new discussion, which will automatically be at the bottom. I will respond to comments here, unless you request otherwise. Please read the following helpful hints, as well as our talk page guidelines before posting:

  • Please add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your message. This will create an identifying signature and timestamp.
  • If you're here to inform me of a mistake I made while on administrative duty, please indicate which article is concerned by enclosing the title of the article in two sets of square brackets: [[example article]].
  • If you are looking for my talk page's previous contents, they are in the archives.


Start a new talk topic


Deletion of the Society of North American Goldsmiths article on Dec 26 2020

I am trying to learn more about being a Wikipedia editor and was trying to understand why this page was deleted.

It used to be here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Society_of_North_American_Goldsmiths&action=edit&redlink=1

Trying to learn so would appreciate any insight you can provide

Thanks Emage2 Emage2 (talk) 23:41, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emage2, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society of North American Goldsmiths for why this article was deleted. Sandstein 09:26, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

Happy New Year 2021
I hope your New Year holiday is enjoyable and the coming year is much better than the one we are leaving behind.
Best wishes from Los Angeles.   // Timothy :: talk 

Happy New Year!

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

So were you including the sockpuppet's opinion in the A. E. London Delete decision?

According tp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pmand, that account was a sockpuppet and has been blocked indefinitely. The only other 'delete' comment after the article was re-listed was from an editor who is mostly retired and, I suspect, was specifically recruited to the discussion for that purpose. I personally resisted the urge to recruit friends who are also long-established editors to express opinions in concert with mine as I understand that to be against community expectations. I mentioned the nomination for deletion on my facebook, but mostly the result was expressions of renewed revulsion at how much Wikipedia sucks (not my opinion- theirs) rather than any desire by people to engage with it. Is there any minimum expectation level of engagement by real people with a discussion like this in order to show consensus? Netmouse (talk) 04:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Netmouse, please link to the discussion at issue. Sandstein 10:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'm not sure the best way to link to it so here's the whole url: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/A._E._London Netmouse (talk) 19:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Like this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. E. London. Netmouse, in this discussion, everybody but you was in favor of deletion. Irrespective what one may think of individual opinions, in the end there's no other way I could close this discussion. Sandstein 22:19, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Masters of the Universe: Revelation Page Move

Hey, so, I was wondering if you knew how to move the Masters of the Universe: Revelation page from draft space to main page. You were the last person, besides me, that edited the article. So, can you help me out? FilmLover72 (Talk) 8:30 3 January 2021 (UTC)

FilmLover72, I do not undelete articles, sorry. Sandstein 12:30, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 9MOTHER9HORSE9EYES9 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 9MOTHER9HORSE9EYES9 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9MOTHER9HORSE9EYES9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lunyaah (talk) 18:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]