Jump to content

User:EbedYahweh and User:EbedYahweh/sandbox: Difference between pages

(Difference between pages)
Page 1
Page 2
Content deleted Content added
EbedYahweh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Fix
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User sandbox}}
I'm kinda abandoning Wikipedia... see below.
<!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->


&reg;
{{User Wikiproject Grammar}}{{Template:User dst 3}}{{User:EWikist/Userboxes/MistakeBox}}{{User:Wikipedian19265478/Cluttered}}


&Delta; H
{{cquote|Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance.}} <div align="right">-- Albert Einstein</div>
<math>\Delta H_P</math>


<nowiki>{{Sahrdaya College of Advanced Studies}}</nowiki><!--
== Interesting from Wikipedia ==
* Welcome to the sandbox! *
Check out my book: [[User:EbedYahweh/Books/Interesting]]
* Please leave this part alone *
* The page is cleared regularly *
* Feel free to try your editing skills below *
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■-->
{{sand}}
{{update|date=November 2018}}
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] '''This is the only warning you will receive''' for using inflammatory, derogatory, or racist language.
Using inflammatory, derogatory, or racist language outside of a purely encyclopedic context are considered [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. Please review this policy before posting again. If you use inflammatory, derogatory, or racist language on Wikipedia in violation of this policy again, you will be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing''' without further notice.


{{Single notice}}
== Bias of Wikipedia ==
{{Non-free 2D art}}
Wikipedia used to be a great source of information in many cases (though not a cite-able source). However, I have become fed up with all the political and religious biases (read: mainstream liberal and atheist) that have run rampant despite the NPOV policy.
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, EbedYahweh. We [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome]] your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things [[Special:Contributions/EbedYahweh|you have written about]] on Wikipedia, you may have a [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|conflict of interest]] or close connection to the subject.


All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]] content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] and writing with as little bias as possible.


If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


*'''Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating''' articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Rather than continue to get upset at this, I have decided to mostly abandon ship. Most of my edits will be simple compulsory grammar or spelling changes, that I can't help but fix.
*'''Be cautious about deletion discussions'''. Everyone is welcome to provide information about [[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent sources]] in [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|deletion discussions]], but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
*'''Avoid linking''' to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see [[Wikipedia:Spam]]).
*'''Exercise great caution''' so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.


Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability of information]], and [[Wikipedia:Autobiography|autobiographies]].


For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations|our frequently asked questions for organizations]]. Thank you.{{#if:|&nbsp;[[User:AnomieBOT]] ([[User talk:AnomieBOT|talk]]) 16:54, 25 March 2014 (UTC)}}<!-- THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. -->[[:Category:User talk pages with conflict of interest notices|EbedYahweh/sandbox]]<!-- Template:uw-coi -->


[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]]. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:AnomieBOT|my talk page]], or take a look at our [[Wikipedia:External links|guidelines]] about links. Thank you. [[:Category:User talk pages with Uw-spam1 notices|EbedYahweh/sandbox]]<!-- Template:uw-spam1 -->


[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not add inappropriate [[Wikipedia:External links|external links]] to Wikipedia. [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#LINK|Wikipedia is not a collection of links]], nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See [[Wikipedia:External links|the external links guideline]] and [[Wikipedia:Spam|spam guideline]] for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the [[nofollow]] attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.[[:Category:User talk pages with Uw-spam2 notices|EbedYahweh/sandbox]]<!-- Template:uw-spam2 -->
== Great evidences for Creation (or young earth)/against Evolution ==
=== Chirality ===


[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop adding inappropriate [[Wikipedia:External links|external links]] to Wikipedia. It is considered [[Wikipedia:Spam|spamming]] and [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#ADVERTISING|Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion]]. Because Wikipedia uses [[nofollow]] tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. [[:Category:User talk pages with Uw-spam3 notices|EbedYahweh/sandbox]]<!-- Template:uw-spam3 -->
Life couldn't have come from non-life because of the problem of chirality (specifically, enantiomeric resolution).
I might add more details here later...


[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you insert a [[Wikipedia:Spam|spam]] link, you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. Persistent spammers may have their websites [[Wikipedia:Spam blacklist|blacklisted]], preventing anyone from linking to them from all [[foundation:Our projects|Wikimedia sites]] as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.[[:Category:User talk pages with Uw-spam4 notices|EbedYahweh/sandbox]]<!-- Template:uw-spam4 -->
=== Rapid Decay theory ===


[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your '''only warning'''; if you insert a [[Wikipedia:Spam|spam]] link to Wikipedia again, you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. Persistent spammers may have their websites [[Wikipedia:Spam blacklist|blacklisted]], preventing anyone from linking to them from all [[foundation:Our projects|Wikimedia sites]] as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.[[:Category:User talk pages with Uw-spam4im notices|EbedYahweh/sandbox]]<!-- Template:uw-spam4im -->
[http://www.sedin.org/crs_sapm/21_3a1.htm Dr. Russel Humphreys article] This article explains in an amazing way how the [[Rapid-decay theory]] correctly reproduced and predicted known ''and'' unknown (at the time) data of planetary magnetic fields. The [[Dynamo Theory]] has never been this consistent with evidence.

<nowiki>{{block-spam}}</nowiki>