Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests

Arbitration case names

Is there any progress update on the proposed change to case naming? If there isn't any imminent change, then I would like to merge the proof of concept I discussed earlier into the {{ArbCase}} template. It would work as usual on existing case names, but also allow defined aliases to work. isaacl (talk) 05:16, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

January proceeding

There was a January proceeding at AE that is now moot in the sense that my one-month topic ban from the Donald Trump article has ended, but it’s not moot in the sense that User:NeilN is presently relying on it to give me a broader and indefinite topic ban in response to a since-deleted comment at my user talk page. Can I or should I explicitly include that January AE proceeding in my request for Amendment of Neil’s sanction that is currently under way, or is such inclusion already implied? Anythingyouwant (talk) 23:53, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Pinging User:Alex Shih, the arb who most recently wrote at this page. Anythingyouwant (talk) 00:22, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Pinging User:Doug Weller who wrote at this page next most recently. Anythingyouwant (talk) 00:56, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

These two arbitrators, User:Doug Weller and User:Alex Shih, have been actively editing, so I guess they just don’t feel like answering. Anythingyouwant (talk) 06:06, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

German war effort

For The Signpost, I need to know something. The clerks noted that with 9 active, 5 Arbs is a majority for this case. The vote is now 8/0/0. Is there something holding up formal acceptance? Is there a clerk shortage as suggested in the comment? ☆ Bri (talk) 18:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

No, it's because the arbs are discussing potential case scope before opening.[1] bishzilla _ROARR!! pocket 18:27, 3 May 2018 (UTC).