User talk:Attack Ramon

Welcome!

Hello, Attack Ramon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 00:21, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Note

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, what's this related to? Attack Ramon (talk) 15:11, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

You are editing Timber Sycamore which falls under this topic. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:17, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the heads up. Attack Ramon (talk) 15:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Revert restriction

ARBPIA has a revert restriction requiring editors to wait a minimum of 24 hours after the initial removal of an edit they made to restore it. You violated that at Khan al-Ahmar. If you do not self-revert you will be reported. nableezy - 21:32, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Waiting ten minutes wont resolve the issue with the violation of the restriction on restoring your edit. If you revert again I will file the report. nableezy - 21:37, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Is it 24 hours or not? Attack Ramon (talk) 21:38, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Youre welcome to test that. I will file the report for the violation of the 1rr that youve committed if you continue to edit-war. nableezy - 21:40, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

What does the rule say? Attack Ramon (talk) 23:51, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

The rule say you have to wait 24h from the last revert of your material by another editor.--Shrike (talk) 09:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

i gotta know

I just have one thing I am really curious about. Does it bother you even a little when one of your accounts is found out? Or is it just a screw it there are plenty more where that come from? Does the new 500 edit rule make much of a difference? Or just a few days of inconvenience while you stretch out the edits adding a reference? I mean this account was pretty obvious so I assume youll be cool giving an honest answer. nableezy - 21:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)