Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2018-12-01/Arbitration report: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 13:36, 2 December 2018

← Back to Arbitration report

Discuss this story

The latter case has a more general discussion at WT:Harassment which may cause change to that policy. --Izno (talk) 16:46, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And the former case has a discussion hanging around (I think WP:VPT but it might be WP:VPPOL) regarding removing the technical ability of administrators to unblock themselves. The WMF went ahead and implemented a change on that in the middle of the community discussion. --Izno (talk) 16:47, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Request: Re: "....an experienced editor..." -- News is about who, what, when, why, where, and how. That delicate sensibilities have somehow rendered the writer unable to identify the fact that Jytdog is the subject of the proposed (now nearly accepted) second case is a marked fail for the Signpost as a Wikipedia news source. Carrite (talk) 19:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There has also been a request declined in which arbitrators named as parties declined to recuse and saw no issue in voting against a case in which their own actions would have been examined. What with the case mentioned above, where some Arbitrators appear to not understand that making a phone call is not necessarily a form of harassment, there is much more that could have been in this report. EdChem (talk) 13:36, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 19:11, 1 December 2018 edit Carrite (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 87,876 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:36, 2 December 2018 edit undo EdChem (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 17,226 edits report leaves out a lot Next edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	* New Request: Re: ''"....an experienced editor..."'' -- News is about who, what, when, why, where, and how. That delicate sensibilities have somehow rendered the writer unable to identify the fact that [[User:Jytdog\|Jytdog]] is the subject of the proposed (now nearly accepted) second case is a marked fail for the ''Signpost'' as a Wikipedia news source. [[User:Carrite\|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite\|talk]]) 19:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)		* New Request: Re: ''"....an experienced editor..."'' -- News is about who, what, when, why, where, and how. That delicate sensibilities have somehow rendered the writer unable to identify the fact that [[User:Jytdog\|Jytdog]] is the subject of the proposed (now nearly accepted) second case is a marked fail for the ''Signpost'' as a Wikipedia news source. [[User:Carrite\|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite\|talk]]) 19:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

			*There has also been a request declined in which arbitrators named as parties declined to recuse and saw no issue in voting against a case in which their own actions would have been examined. What with the case mentioned above, where some Arbitrators appear to not understand that making a phone call is not necessarily a form of harassment, there is much more that could have been in this report. [[User:EdChem\|EdChem]] ([[User talk:EdChem\|talk]]) 13:36, 2 December 2018 (UTC)