Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Mountain Party: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 01:20, 27 April 2019

Green Mountain Party

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Party has no elected officers and little to no membership. Almost all sources here are self-published or “Letter to the editor” types, and none of them provide significant, non-trivial coverage. Toa Nidhiki05 18:44, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this absolutely unnotable political party. Trillfendi (talk) 23:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this party has achieved the status of minor party in Vermont, the first since the Progressives in the 1980s, and in order to do so was required to reach a threshold of organization in ten towns and is featured in multiple non-editorial articles. User:Jon698 (User talk:Jon698) 00:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Party organization in Vermont is not an establishment of notability; all it requires is basically having three people in ten towns (Vermont has 250 towns, 10 being 4%). You can theoretically "organize" a party with 30 people. Sources have not given non-trivial coverage (saying something exists doesn't make it notable). Toa Nidhiki05 01:13, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Jon698. User:ImBadWithUsernames (User talk:ImBadWithUsernames) 13:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This account seems highly suspicious. It only has a handful of edits, one of which was to, without a summary of context, remove tags placed by another user on a page Jon698 was heavily involved on. This user has virtually no other edits. Toa Nidhiki05 13:59, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You found a single example of me editing the same article as somebody, who is one of the most prolific political related article makers, who has edited and created thousands. User:ImBadWithUsernames (User talk:ImBadWithUsernames) 01:18, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 *'''Keep, per [[User:Jon698|Jon698]].''' [[User:ImBadWithUsernames]] ([[User talk:ImBadWithUsernames]]) 13:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 :*'''Comment''' This account seems highly suspicious. It only has a handful of edits, one of which was to, without a summary of context, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Independent_Party_of_Delaware&diff=prev&oldid=797289580 remove tags placed by another user on a page Jon698 was heavily involved on]. This user has virtually no other edits. '''[[User:Toa Nidhiki05|<i style="color: green; font-family: Mistral;">Toa</i>]] [[User talk:Toa Nidhiki05|<i style="color: green; font-family: Mistral;">Nidhiki05</i>]]''' 13:59, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
+:*'''Comment''' You found a single example of me editing the same article as somebody, who is one of the most prolific political related article makers, who has edited and created thousands. [[User:ImBadWithUsernames]] ([[User talk:ImBadWithUsernames]]) 01:18, 27 April 2019 (UTC)