Draft:Palestinian Popsicle-Stick Propaganda: Difference between revisions
Sungodtemple (talk | contribs) Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G3). |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Palestinian Popsicle-Stick Propaganda}} |
{{Short description|Palestinian Popsicle-Stick Propaganda}} |
||
{{db-hoax|help=off}} |
|||
{{Draft topics|west-asia}} |
{{Draft topics|west-asia}} |
||
{{AfC topic|other}} |
{{AfC topic|other}} |
||
Revision as of 02:25, 19 April 2024
| This draft may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a blatant hoax. This only applies to cases where the deception is so obvious as to constitute pure vandalism. Additionally, the mere fact that the page is about a hoax does not, on its own, qualify for speedy deletion. See CSD G3.
If this draft does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message. Note that this draft may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation posted to the talk page is found to be insufficient. Note to page author: you have not edited the talk page yet. If you wish to contest this speedy deletion, clicking the button above will allow you to leave a talk page message explaining why you think this page should not be deleted. If you have already posted to the talk page but this message is still showing up, try purging the page cache. This page was last edited by Sungodtemple (contribs | logs) at 02:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC) (14 days ago) |
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,568 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
In the realm of rhetoric and persuasion, we often encounter arguments that, upon closer inspection, reveal themselves to be as fragile as a house made of popsicle sticks[1]. One such concept is that of "Palestinian Popsicle-Stick Propaganda.[1]"
This term is a metaphorical representation of arguments that are seemingly attractive and robust on the surface, much like a popsicle stick house[1]. However, they lack a solid foundation and can easily collapse under scrutiny, just like a popsicle stick house ready to fall apart[1].
The concept is akin to a "self-licking ice cream cone" argument, a term used to describe a situation that exists primarily to justify its existence. It's a cycle that feeds on itself, much like an ice cream cone that somehow licks itself[1][2].
In the context of "Palestinian Popsicle-Stick Propaganda," it refers to narratives or arguments that may seem appealing or convincing at first glance[1]. Still, they are fundamentally groundless and can melt away under the heat of critical examination, just like a melting popsicle[1].
For example, the casualty figures from the Gaza Health Ministry[1]. Experts like Abraham Wyner have questioned their unnatural consistency, suggesting potential data manipulation[1][3]. Wyner also points out the lack of correlation between child and female casualties, indicating the numbers may not be real[1][3]. Moreover, the ministry's admission of holding "incomplete data" for a third of the casualties undermines its credibility[1][3]. These examples align with the concept of a "self-licking ice cream cone" argument, a situation that exists primarily to justify its existence[1][2]. In this context, the propagation of these flawed arguments fuels the cycle of misinformation and conflict[1]. It's crucial to critically examine these narratives and strive for a discourse that values truth and substance over empty rhetoric[1]. These instances of misinformation and skewed narratives are the popsicle sticks that prop up the fragile structure of the propaganda, ready to collapse under the weight of truth and critical examination[1].
The "self-licking ice cream cone" argument is meant to draw parallels with the type of circular propaganda often employed by Pro-Palestinian propagandists[1][2]. Their arguments are structured in a way that they feed off themselves, typically relying on emotional responses that discourage critical review[1]. As a result, these arguments exist primarily to perpetuate their own groundless claims[1].
This concept closely relates to the idea of "Palestinian Popsicle-Stick Propaganda[1]." Both involve the use of seemingly convincing narratives that, upon closer examination, lack substantial evidence or logical coherence[1]. They both rely on emotional appeal rather than factual accuracy, and they both serve to perpetuate a particular narrative rather than encouraging a balanced and critical examination of the situation[1]. In essence, they are self-perpetuating narratives that melt under the heat of scrutiny, much like a popsicle or a self-licking ice cream cone[1][2].
The Al Shifa hospital incident is another example of how "Palestinian Popsicle-Stick Propaganda" operates[1][4]. In this case, the narrative that was hastily propagated by Hamas and the Gaza Health Ministry was that Israel had bombed the hospital[1][4].
However, upon closer examination, it was revealed that the damage was actually caused by a failed missile strike from another militant group, not Israel[1][4]. This misinformation, which initially seemed convincing, lacked substantial evidence and failed under scrutiny, much like a popsicle-stick house ready to fall apart[1]. It served to feed off emotional responses and discourage critical review, thereby perpetuating groundless arguments[1].
This incident underscores the importance of thorough examination and critical thinking as this incident significantly swayed public opinion against Israel[1]. This reckless spread of misinformation not only misled the public but also manipulated global sentiment[1]. Such actions underscore the importance of truth in understanding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the damaging effects of disingenuous narratives[1].
References
- ⚠️ Palestinian Popsicle-Stick Propaganda ⚠️
- U.S. Military Lingo: The (Almost) Definitive Guide
- Rahim Mohamed: Hamas death numbers can't be trusted — here's more evidence they are inflated
- Aerial photos reveal scene of Gaza hospital explosion — a charred parking lot
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad Testani, Jeff (2024-04-09). "⚠️ Palestinian Popsicle-Stick Propaganda ⚠️". www.linkedin.com. Retrieved 2024-04-19.
- ^ a b c d "Self-licking ice cream cone", Wikipedia, 2024-01-25, retrieved 2024-04-19
- ^ a b c Rahim, Mohamed (03/27/2024). "Rahim Mohamed: Hamas death numbers can't be trusted — here's more evidence they are inflated".
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ a b c "Aerial photos reveal scene of Gaza hospital explosion — a charred parking lot". 10/18/2023.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help)