Natasha Demkina: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
restored wikilinks. ASkolnick, please be careful with restoring your text
notes -> refs, also add external links for non-refs
Line 13: Line 13:
In the Discovery Channel program<ref name="Discovery"/>, Demkina offered a number of explanations for why she failed to see the specified conditions in three of the subjects and reported seeing those conditions in three wrong subjects. She said that she should have looked longer and deeper to find the subject who has a metal plate covering a missing section of his skull, even though the outline of the large metal plate could be seen beneath the scalp from up close. She said surgical scars interfered with her ability to see the resected [[esophagus]] and removed [[appendix (human)|appendix]], although those surgical scars should have helped her identify the correct subjects, the researchers explained. Demkina also claimed that appendixes can grow back after an appendectomy, a claim the investigators dismissed as simply not true.<ref name="Discovery"/><ref name="skolnick"/>
In the Discovery Channel program<ref name="Discovery"/>, Demkina offered a number of explanations for why she failed to see the specified conditions in three of the subjects and reported seeing those conditions in three wrong subjects. She said that she should have looked longer and deeper to find the subject who has a metal plate covering a missing section of his skull, even though the outline of the large metal plate could be seen beneath the scalp from up close. She said surgical scars interfered with her ability to see the resected [[esophagus]] and removed [[appendix (human)|appendix]], although those surgical scars should have helped her identify the correct subjects, the researchers explained. Demkina also claimed that appendixes can grow back after an appendectomy, a claim the investigators dismissed as simply not true.<ref name="Discovery"/><ref name="skolnick"/>


== Notes ==
== References ==
<references/>
<references/>

== External Links ==
*[http://english.pravda.ru/science/health/20-04-2005/8097-demkina-0 "Russian X-ray girl thrills Japanese scientists with her remarkable gift"], [[Pravda]], 20 Apr 2005
*[http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/08-11-2004/7330-xray-0 "Americans expose Russian X-ray Girl"], [[Pravda]], 8 Nov 2004
*[http://www.guardian.co.uk/medicine/story/0,11381,1312544,00.html "Visionary or fortune teller? Why scientists find diagnoses of 'x-ray' girl hard to stomach "], [[The Guardian]], 25 Sept 2004
*[http://www.skepticalinvestigations.org/Demkina/Barrington_scientists.htm "Respected Scientists? The Natasha Demkina Case"], Skeptical Investigations, 1 Dec 2005
*[http://www.skepticalinvestigations.org/Demkina/ The Demkina File] at Skeptical Investigations
*[http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/483/ The Girl With X-Ray Eyes] at Museum of Hoaxes
*[http://www.victorzammit.com/articles/natashacansue.html Natasha Demkina Can Sue...] by Victor Zammit
*[http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_860742.html%3Fmenu%3Dnews.scienceanddiscovery"TV doctor in health scare after meeting 'X-ray vision' girl"], Ananova, May 2005 ([[Google]] cache)


[[Category:1987 births|Demkina, Natasha]]
[[Category:1987 births|Demkina, Natasha]]

Revision as of 18:08, 1 March 2006

Natasha Demkina (Russian: Наталья Демкина; born 1987) is a female from Saransk, Russia, who claims to possess a special vision that allows her to look inside human bodies and see organs and tissues, and thereby make medical diagnoses. Since the age of ten, she has performed readings in Russia. In 2004 she appeared on television shows in the United Kingdom and on the Discovery Channel.

Since 2004 Demkina is a full-time student of the Semashko State Stomatological University, Moscow.

Discovery Channel Appearance

In May 2004 she was brought to New York City by the Discovery Channel to appear on a documentary titled The Girl with X-Ray Eyes,[1] and to be tested by researchers under partially controlled conditions. The preliminary test was arranged by Ray Hyman and Richard Wiseman of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP) and Andrew Skolnick of the Commission for Scientific Medicine and Mental Health (CSMMH). The test required Demkina to correctly match six specified anatomical anomalies resulting from surgery to six volunteer subjects and one "normal" control. [2]

The test was designed to look only for a strongly pronounced ability. The researchers believed that a weak and erratic effect would be useless for medical diagnosis, but would still be of theoretical interest. Because of a lack of resources and time, the researches chose to test only for a strong effect. In addition, the influence of the "Clever Hans effect" cannot be ruled out under the lax conditions of the preliminary test.[2]. Demkina and the investigators had agreed before the test that the threshold would be 5 of 7 correct identifications.[2]

In the 4-hour-long test, Demkina correctly identified four subjects, including the control subject. The researchers concluded that she had not demonstrated evidence of an ability that would warrant their further study.[3][4] The design and conclusions of the experiment were subsequently the subjects of considerable dispute between Demkina's supporters and those of the investigators.[5][6]

In the Discovery Channel program[1], Demkina offered a number of explanations for why she failed to see the specified conditions in three of the subjects and reported seeing those conditions in three wrong subjects. She said that she should have looked longer and deeper to find the subject who has a metal plate covering a missing section of his skull, even though the outline of the large metal plate could be seen beneath the scalp from up close. She said surgical scars interfered with her ability to see the resected esophagus and removed appendix, although those surgical scars should have helped her identify the correct subjects, the researchers explained. Demkina also claimed that appendixes can grow back after an appendectomy, a claim the investigators dismissed as simply not true.[1][3]

References

  1. ^ a b c The Discovery Channel, 2004, The Girl with X-Ray Eyes
  2. ^ a b c Hyman R, Skeptical Inquirer, May 2005, Testing Natasha
  3. ^ a b Skolnick AA, Skeptical Inquirer, May 2005, Testing Natasha: The Girl with Normal Eyes
  4. ^ Hyman R, CSICOP, Statistics and the Test of Natasha
  5. ^ CSMMH, Answer to Critics
  6. ^ Scientists fail to see eye to eye over girl's "X-ray vision", Times Higher Ed. Supp., 10 Dec 2004

External Links