Rule of the Major-Generals: Difference between revisions
copy edit the last edit |
→References: ce |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Policies== |
==Policies== |
||
The Rule of the Major-Generals was set up by Cromwell by his orders to the army, and was not supported by parliamentary legislation. His goal was threefold: to identify, tax, disarm and weaken the Royalists, who he saw as conspirators against his rule. Second, was an economical measure because the military budget been cut. The major generals would take control of incumbent civilian administrations, and not require an expansion of local military forces. Thirdly, he sought "a reformation of manners" or moral regeneration through the suppression of vice and the encouragement of virtue, which he considered much too neglected.{{citation needed|date=July 2017}} Historian Austin Woolrych, using |
The Rule of the Major-Generals was set up by Cromwell by his orders to the army, and was not supported by parliamentary legislation. His goal was threefold: to identify, tax, disarm and weaken the Royalists, who he saw as conspirators against his rule. Second, was an economical measure because the military budget been cut. The major generals would take control of incumbent civilian administrations, and not require an expansion of local military forces. Thirdly, he sought "a reformation of manners" or moral regeneration through the suppression of vice and the encouragement of virtue, which he considered much too neglected.{{citation needed|date=July 2017}} Historian Austin Woolrych, using 21st century terminology, said the Puritans did not considered it inappropriate to "employee senior military officers as vice squad chiefs". The rule by Major Generals was a year or so in length.{{sfn|Woolrych|2004|p=625}} |
||
Cromwell appointed the Major Generals soon after he had news of the defeat of the [[Hispaniola expedition (1655)|expedition to Hispaniola]] (commanded by [[William Penn (Royal Navy officer)|William Penn]] and [[Robert Venables]]), reached London in late July 1655. He felt that this defeat was God punishing him for not trying to make England a more religious, godly place.{{sfn|''The National Archives''}}{{sfn|Durston|2001|p=21}} |
Cromwell appointed the Major Generals soon after he had news of the defeat of the [[Hispaniola expedition (1655)|expedition to Hispaniola]] (commanded by [[William Penn (Royal Navy officer)|William Penn]] and [[Robert Venables]]), reached London in late July 1655. He felt that this defeat was God punishing him for not trying to make England a more religious, godly place.{{sfn|''The National Archives''}}{{sfn|Durston|2001|p=21}} |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
* {{Citation|last=Plant |first=David |url=http://www.british-civil-wars.co.uk/glossary/rule-major-generals.htm |title=Rule of the Major-Generals |publisher=[http://www.british-civil-wars.co.uk British Civil Wars and Commonwealth website] |date= 22 August 2008 }} |
* {{Citation|last=Plant |first=David |url=http://www.british-civil-wars.co.uk/glossary/rule-major-generals.htm |title=Rule of the Major-Generals |publisher=[http://www.british-civil-wars.co.uk British Civil Wars and Commonwealth website] |date= 22 August 2008 }} |
||
* {{Citation|last=Royle |first=Trevor |title=Civil War: The Wars of the Three Kingdoms 1638–1660 |publisher=Pub Abacus |year=2006 |origyear=2004 |isbn=978-0-349-11564-1}} |
* {{Citation|last=Royle |first=Trevor |title=Civil War: The Wars of the Three Kingdoms 1638–1660 |publisher=Pub Abacus |year=2006 |origyear=2004 |isbn=978-0-349-11564-1}} |
||
* {{citation|last=Woolrych |first=Austin |year=2004 |title=Britain in Revolution: 1625-1660 |
* {{citation|last=Woolrych |first=Austin |year=2004 |title=Britain in Revolution: 1625-1660|publisher=Oxford UP|year=2002}} |
||
'''Attribution:''' |
'''Attribution:''' |
||
Revision as of 11:04, 11 July 2017
The Rule of the Major-Generals from August 1655 – January 1657,[1] was a period of direct military government during Oliver Cromwell's Protectorate.[2] England was divided into ten regions[3] each governed by a major-general who answered to the Lord Protector.[2]
Policies
The Rule of the Major-Generals was set up by Cromwell by his orders to the army, and was not supported by parliamentary legislation. His goal was threefold: to identify, tax, disarm and weaken the Royalists, who he saw as conspirators against his rule. Second, was an economical measure because the military budget been cut. The major generals would take control of incumbent civilian administrations, and not require an expansion of local military forces. Thirdly, he sought "a reformation of manners" or moral regeneration through the suppression of vice and the encouragement of virtue, which he considered much too neglected.[citation needed] Historian Austin Woolrych, using 21st century terminology, said the Puritans did not considered it inappropriate to "employee senior military officers as vice squad chiefs". The rule by Major Generals was a year or so in length.[4]
Cromwell appointed the Major Generals soon after he had news of the defeat of the expedition to Hispaniola (commanded by William Penn and Robert Venables), reached London in late July 1655. He felt that this defeat was God punishing him for not trying to make England a more religious, godly place.[5][6]
Like Cromwell, the Major Generals were committed Puritans (Congregationalist reformers with Calvinist leanings). Part of their job was to try to make England more godly. They clamped down on what they considered to be rowdy behaviour (such as heavy drinking, music, dancing and fairs). They even tried to stop Christmas celebrations. Not surprisingly, the rule of the Major Generals was not popular.[5]
The Major-Generals and their regions
There were ten regional associations covering England and Wales administered by major-generals. Ireland under Major-General Henry Cromwell,[a] and Scotland under Major-General George Monck were in administrations already agreed upon and were not part of the scheme.[7]
| Name | Period | Region | Deputies | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Berry | Appointed in 1655 | Herefordshire, Shropshire, Worcestershire and Wales | John Nicholas in Monmouthshire; Rowland Dawkins in Carmarthenshire, Cardiganshire, Glamorgan, Pembrokeshire. |
|
| William Boteler (Butler) | Bedfordshire, Huntingdonshire, Northamptonshire and Rutland | Zealous and uncompromising in his hostility to his religious and political enemies, Boteler was a severe persecutor of Quakers in Northamptonshire; in 1656 he advocated that James Nayler should be stoned to death for blasphemy. Boteler was also aggressive in his persecution of Royalists in his area, unlawfully imprisoning the Earl of Northampton for failing to pay his taxes. | ||
| John Desborough | Cornwall, Devon, Dorset, Gloucestershire, Somerset and Wiltshire | |||
| Charles Fleetwood | Appointed in 1655 | Buckinghamshire, Cambridgeshire, Essex, Hertfordshire, Isle of Ely, Norfolk, Oxfordshire and Suffolk | George Fleetwood (a distant kinsman) in Buckinghamshire; Hezekiah Haynes in Essex, Cambridgeshire, Isle of Ely, Norfolk, Suffolk; William Packer as military governor of Hertfordshire and Oxfordshire |
Owing to his other responsibilities on the Council of State, day to day matters in his region were overseen by Fleetwood's three deputies.[7] |
| William Goffe | October 1655 | Berkshire, Hampshire and Sussex | ||
| Thomas Kelsey | Surrey and Kent | |||
| John Lambert | Cumberland, County Durham, Northumberland, Westmorland and Yorkshire | Charles Howard in Cumberland, Northumberland, Westmorland; Robert Lilburne in County Durham, Yorkshire |
Owing to his other responsibilities on the Council of State, day to day matters in his region were overseen by Lambert's two deputies.[7] | |
| Philip Skippon | Middlesex; including the cities of London and Westminster | Sir John Barkstead | Skippon was by now elderly, and on the Council of State, so most of the day to day matters in his region were largely undertaken by Barkstead,[7] | |
| Edward Whalley | Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire, Nottinghamshire, Warwickshire, | |||
| Charles Worsley; Tobias Bridge |
1655–June 1656; June 1656–January 1657 |
Cheshire, Lancashire and Staffordshire |
Notes
- ^ Henry Cromwell was nominally under the Lord Deputy of Ireland, Charles Fleetwood, but Fleetwood's departure for England in September 1655 left Cromwell the ruler of Ireland for all practical purposes.
- ^ Little 2007, p. 15.
- ^ a b Plant 2008.
- ^ Royle 2006, p. 698.
- ^ Woolrych 2004, p. 625.
- ^ a b The National Archives.
- ^ Durston 2001, p. 21.
- ^ a b c d Royle 2006, pp. 698, 699.
References
- Durston, Christopher (2001), Cromwell's Major-Generals: Godly Government During the English Revolution, Manchester University Press, p. 21, ISBN 978-0-7190-6065-6
- Little, Paterick (1 January 2007), "Putting the Protector back into the Protectorate", BBC history magazine, 8 (1): 15
- Plant, David (22 August 2008), Rule of the Major-Generals, British Civil Wars and Commonwealth website
{{citation}}: External link in|publisher= - Royle, Trevor (2006) [2004], Civil War: The Wars of the Three Kingdoms 1638–1660, Pub Abacus, ISBN 978-0-349-11564-1
- Woolrych, Austin (2002), Britain in Revolution: 1625-1660, Oxford UP
Attribution:
- This article incorporates text from a publication under version 3.0 of the British Open Government Licence which is a Wikipedia compatible copyleft licence: "Civil War - What kind of ruler was Oliver Cromwell? - Cromwell in his own words - Source 3", The National Archives, retrieved 11 September 2015
Further reading
- Little, Patrick (2012), "Major-generals (act. 1655–1657)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.), Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/95468 (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)