Talk:Falcon 9 B1046

Rocketry C‑class Mid‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spaceflight C‑class Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Falcon 9 Booster Disintegrated.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:36, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overturning non-consensus decided decision to remove B1046

@Mfb: @Insertcleverphrasehere: @C-randles: @JFG: @Fcrary: @OkayKenji: @Gial Ackbar: Unfortunately, a lot of these important articles have been deleted without any of us being notified about the move. I agree it may seem much, I only intended to do B1046 and B1048 but ended up doing B1047 and started a trend which resulted in more. But these articles allow for much more information. Some of the articles like B1050, B1051 can remain deleted for now, pending further discussion but significant ones, especially B1046 and B1048 with their reusability milestone significance, deserve their own article. Their info cannot be stored in List of Falcon 9 first stage Boosters or the main article. I move on this page B1046 be re-instated. - AndrewRG10 (talk) 9:57, February 16 2020 (UTC)

Due to new photo we've wanted and more to come, the page has been re-instated. B1046 will soon expand to cover minor development of Block 5 with pictures of B1046 testing. --AndrewRG10 (talk) 08:27, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And page has been reviewed. -AndrewRG10 (talk) 06:34, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]