Talk:Jubilee 150 Walkway: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:56, 15 June 2009

Australia: Adelaide Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Jubilee 150 Walkway is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Adelaide (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Sorry to spoil the party but...

This article is ridiculously overburdened with images... I know it took a lot of work to put together, but it looks a lot more like a gallery than an encyclopaedic article. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 14:34, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to your opinion; mine is different.

I'm somewhat puzzled (but not offended) by first, your opinion, and second, your need to express your opinion in such emotive subjective language.

What value is there in you saying that you think it is "ridiculously overburdened"? It doesn't convey any information further than your opinion.

"but it looks a lot more like a gallery than an encyclopaedic article." - I don't see why "a gallery" and "an encyclopaedic article" are mutually exclusive. Please explain the issue.

J150W IS visual. That's the point of its existance. Why is this a problem?

Further, why do you feel it is necessary to make a fuss about it?

I can accept the fact that "you don't like it". But first: Is that the case you are making? (And if so, why?) And second: OK. That's your opinion. So what?

Can I have less emotive language, less opinion, and more facts please? Pdfpdf (talk) 14:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 This article is ridiculously overburdened with images... I know it took a lot of work to put together, but it looks a lot more like a gallery than an encyclopaedic article. [[User:Diliff|Diliff]]   <small>| [[User talk:Diliff|(Talk)]]   [[Special:Contributions/Diliff|(Contribs)]]</small> 14:34, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
+:You're welcome to your opinion; mine is different.
+:I'm somewhat puzzled (but not offended) by first, your opinion, and second, your need to express your opinion in such emotive subjective language.
+:What value is there in you saying that you think it is "ridiculously overburdened"? It doesn't convey any information further than your opinion.
+:''"but it looks a lot more like a gallery than an encyclopaedic article."'' - I don't see why "a gallery" and "an encyclopaedic article" are mutually exclusive. Please explain the issue.
+:J150W '''''IS''''' visual. That's the point of its existance. Why is this a problem?
+:Further, why do you feel it is necessary to make a fuss about it?
+:I can accept the fact that [[Wikipedia:I just don't like it|"you don't like it"]]. But first: Is that the case you are making? (And if so, why?) And second: OK. That's your opinion. So what?
+:Can I have less emotive language, less opinion, and more facts please? [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 14:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)