Talk:Leigh Court/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Notes: + |
→Template: g2g |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
#It is '''reasonably well written'''. |
#It is '''reasonably well written'''. |
||
#:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch|word choice]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|lists]])'': {{GAList/check| |
#:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch|word choice]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
||
#:: Some notes below |
#:: Some notes below |
||
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''. |
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''. |
||
#:a ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout#Notes and references|reference section]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''(citations to [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} d ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check| |
#:a ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout#Notes and references|reference section]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} b ''(citations to [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} d ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
||
#:: Some strong similarities to another site, can you please do a bit of rewording? Also a few other minor points, all below. |
#:: Some strong similarities to another site, can you please do a bit of rewording? Also a few other minor points, all below. |
||
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''. |
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''. |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
#:: Images all look good and are on Commons. |
#:: Images all look good and are on Commons. |
||
#'''Overall''': |
#'''Overall''': |
||
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check| |
#:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|y}} |
||
#:: A few issues below, but generally a very well written article.<!-- Template:GAList --> |
#:: <s>A few issues below, but generally a very well written article.<s> Happy to pass in updated state<!-- Template:GAList --> |
||
===Notes=== |
===Notes=== |
Revision as of 11:40, 23 March 2017
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Worm That Turned (talk · contribs) 14:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Template
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Some strong similarities to another site, can you please do a bit of rewording? Also a few other minor points, all below.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- No issue with coverage
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- No issue with neutrality
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images all look good and are on Commons.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
A few issues below, but generally a very well written article.Happy to pass in updated state
- Pass/Fail:
Notes
- A few rewording issues (based on https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1320671 - From "The south-east and north-west elevations are identical" to "stone and marble patterned floor." )
- You have acres converting into km2 at one point and into hectares at a different point. Is that intentional, due to the size difference?
- There are a few honorifics which need stripping from the article per WP:HONOR
- "It was possible to visit the house..." when could you do this? can you still?
- I've added "In the middle of the 19th century" but it is not exactly clear from the source when. It was somewhere between their purchase around 1820 and their sale (around 1880). Access to the house is now possible as wedding & conference venue but the "old masters" are long gone.— Rod talk 18:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- "The Miles family continued to occupy the house until 1917 when, in common with many such houses, it had become oversized for modern living;" do we have a source for this? It may be mentioned in one of the offline sources - but I'm just concerned about the possibility of OR.
- Harold Burden's use for the house seems to be mentioned twice in consecutive lines.
- "was eventually restored to much of its former glory " - needs a bit of clarification, who by, when, what does it actually mean?
- REF5 has no page numbers - since the book is nearly 200 pages long, that's not great for a reference
- REF14,REF18, REF27 and REF29 are dead links
- Archiveurls added
- REF19 gives me a warning of malware - is there a better source you could use?
- This was the old URL for Glenside Museum but appears to have been hijacked. I have reused the Carpenter ref which covers the same info (in more detail).— Rod talk 18:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Rod, sorry about the delay. It's a great article, shouldn't take much to get it over the line :) WormTT(talk) 14:43, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- It's looking like I won't be around for a bit (not that I've been around recently anyway!) and since the only thing outstanding is lack of page numbers on one source, I'm going to pass this. Rod, if you can make sure those page numbers are there when you get a chance, I'd appreciate it. Cheers. WormTT(talk) 11:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)