Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Radiohead: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m FL, not FA
Undid revision 271727823 by Dabomb87 (talk). Not used by project.
Line 8: Line 8:
|currentstatus=FL
|currentstatus=FL
}}
}}
{{Wikiproject Alternative music|class=FL|importance=Low}}
{{Wikiproject Alternative music|class=FA|importance=Low}}
==Problems with this article==
==Problems with this article==



Revision as of 07:17, 19 February 2009

Featured listList of awards and nominations received by Radiohead is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 8, 2008Featured list candidatePromoted
Did You KnowA fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 28, 2008.
WikiProject iconAlternative music FA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
FAThis article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Problems with this article

A. It lists Thom Yorke solo nominations (for The Eraser) together with Radiohead nominations.

B. Yet it doesn't list Nigel Godrich's several Grammy nominations for best production/engineering work on Radiohead's albums.

C. It doesn't mention their Ivor Novello award for In Rainbows, Mercury Prize nominations, etc. etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.21.38.143 (talkcontribs)

Thanks for pointing those out. I have added a few more. Please let me know if any are missing. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalsim / inconsistency?

The infobox says they won 2 Q awards, the lead and article say 3 - which is it? Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The citation used only gives 2 Q awards, so I've amended accordingly. --JD554 (talk) 07:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've put it back to 3 as I found a better reference. --JD554 (talk) 07:38, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]