Talk:List of vaping bans in the United States: Difference between revisions
AlbinoFerret (talk | contribs) Add header to talk page, unsure what wikiprojects find local laws and ordinances important |
AlbinoFerret (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talk header}} |
{{talk header}} |
||
{{Ecig sanctions}} |
{{Ecig sanctions}} |
||
==Unreliable source== |
|||
I recently brought the most used source on this page ""States and Municipalities with Laws Regulating Use of Electronic Cigarettes" to [[WP:RSN]], you can find that [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Is_this_source_reliable_for_laws_and_ordinances_of_cities_and_towns.3F section here]. When the subject of the reputation for fact checking and editorial control was discussed it was pointed out this source is not reliable. This is in line with the first sentence of [[WP:RS]] "Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.". |
|||
These claims need to be sourced to reliable sources like new sites, newspapers, etc. I am not going to tag bomb the page but those editors wishing to keep claims on this page should be searching for reliable sources. After a few weeks we will see what can be sourced, and what cant. [[User:AlbinoFerret|<span style="color:white; background-color:#534545; font-weight: bold; font-size: 90%;">AlbinoFerret</span>]] 16:53, 21 September 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:54, 21 September 2015
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of vaping bans in the United States article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
Unreliable source
I recently brought the most used source on this page ""States and Municipalities with Laws Regulating Use of Electronic Cigarettes" to WP:RSN, you can find that section here. When the subject of the reputation for fact checking and editorial control was discussed it was pointed out this source is not reliable. This is in line with the first sentence of WP:RS "Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.". These claims need to be sourced to reliable sources like new sites, newspapers, etc. I am not going to tag bomb the page but those editors wishing to keep claims on this page should be searching for reliable sources. After a few weeks we will see what can be sourced, and what cant. AlbinoFerret 16:53, 21 September 2015 (UTC)