Talk:74 (number)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 75.74.180.52 (talk) at 12:29, 29 September 2013 (→‎'In English(74) Gematria(74)'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconNumbers
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

  • http://www.ngcic.org/
    • In IC 1337 on 2011-04-23 17:08:25, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In IC 1337 on 2011-04-24 04:34:10, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 10 (number) on 2011-05-23 02:06:58, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 10 (number) on 2011-05-31 22:27:07, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 11 (number) on 2011-06-01 02:53:15, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 138 (number) on 2011-06-01 14:55:19, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 48 (number) on 2011-06-19 14:01:14, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 52 (number) on 2011-06-19 20:05:38, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:05, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:05, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 3

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:05, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'In English(74) Gematria(74)'

I tweaked the following... In English Gematria with the key of A=1,B=2...Z=26, English=74=E5+N14+G7+L12+I9+S19+H8, gematria=74=G7+E5+M13+A1+T20+R18+I9+A1, the key=74=T20+H8+E5+K11+E5+Y25. Also, religion=74/89=R18+E5+L12+I9+G7+I9+O(15)+N14, Jewish=74=J10+E5+W23+I9+S19+H8, Jesus=74=J10+E5+S19+U21+S19, Muhammad=74=M13+U21+H8+A1+M13+M13+A1+D4. The ancient principle of Jewish gematria/Greek isopsephy/Arabic Abjad numerals/(hisab al-jummal) had/has the main principle of words with the same alphanumeric sum have a connect between them. 'Coincidentally', connect=74 and between=74. - Benjamin Franklin75.74.180.52 (talk) 15:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's still absurd; using English (Latin) numerology in regard Jewish, Christian, or Islamic works is absurd. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur: Wrong! And gematria is NOT numerology, although a numerologist can use it. A numerologist can also use your height and weight, but that doesn't make your height and weight numerology. But what's absurd is that you can't see the simple(74=S19+I9+M13+P16+L12+E5) connect(74=C3+O15+N14+N14+E5+C3+T20) between(74=B2+E5+T20+W23+E5+E5+N14) English(74) & Gematria(74). I'll bet $74 that you did no research on English gematria before revealing your ignorance on this topic (and possibly your prejudice) took over and you deleted something very important! 949OT. I even gave Wikipedia references to gematria, isopsephy, and Abjad numerals! I'm going to return the article to where it was before you deleted it and I ask you NOT to delete it again. And do some homework on a topic before you act like you are an expert on it! 42113B 1989T. - Benjamin Franklin 75.74.180.52 (talk) 12:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Legend of Osiris(74) and story of Moses

I added the following... *Egyptian legend of Osiris(=74=O+S19+I9+R18+I9+S19), Isis, Horus, Set + 70 others: 74 altogether. *Bible story of Moses, Aaron and his two sons + 70 elders of Israel: 74 altogether - Exodus 24:1. - Benjamin Franklin75.74.180.52 (talk) 16:56, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. Using English letters in regard an Egyptian god is absurd. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:24, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]