Talk:And the Rest Is Drag/GA1: Difference between revisions
→Summary: Reply |
! |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Thanks for taking time to review! Happy to address any concerns ---[[User:Another Believer|<span style="color:navy">Another Believer</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Another Believer|<span style="color:#C60">Talk</span>]])</sub> 20:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC) |
:Thanks for taking time to review! Happy to address any concerns ---[[User:Another Believer|<span style="color:navy">Another Believer</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Another Believer|<span style="color:#C60">Talk</span>]])</sub> 20:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
{{GAProgress | prose = y | mos = y | reflayout = y | reliablesources = y | originalresearch = |copyvio = y | broadness = y | focus = y | neutral = y | stable = y | freeortaggedpics = y | picsrelevant = y}} |
{{GAProgress | prose = y | mos = y | reflayout = y | reliablesources = y | originalresearch = y |copyvio = y | broadness = y | focus = y | neutral = y | stable = y | freeortaggedpics = y | picsrelevant = y}} |
||
===Well-written=== |
===Well-written=== |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
:::I like the sectioning! One teeny source thing. [[User:Averageuntitleduser|Averageuntitleduser]] ([[User talk:Averageuntitleduser|talk]]) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
:::I like the sectioning! One teeny source thing. [[User:Averageuntitleduser|Averageuntitleduser]] ([[User talk:Averageuntitleduser|talk]]) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
::::@[[User:Averageuntitleduser|Averageuntitleduser]] Thanks! I've added a citation by the [[Academy of Television Arts & Sciences]]. ---[[User:Another Believer|<span style="color:navy">Another Believer</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Another Believer|<span style="color:#C60">Talk</span>]])</sub> 22:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
::::@[[User:Averageuntitleduser|Averageuntitleduser]] Thanks! I've added a citation by the [[Academy of Television Arts & Sciences]]. ---[[User:Another Believer|<span style="color:navy">Another Believer</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Another Believer|<span style="color:#C60">Talk</span>]])</sub> 22:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::::Lovely work! Thanks for sticking with me, I'm now happy to pass this article! [[User:Averageuntitleduser|Averageuntitleduser]] ([[User talk:Averageuntitleduser|talk]]) 23:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:08, 28 April 2024
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Another Believer (talk · contribs) 18:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 19:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Quoting this daily from now on. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking time to review! Happy to address any concerns ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Well-written
A pleasant read with a lot of personality! Some nit-picks:
her relationship with her father and his death
— "her relationship with [...] his death" is a bit odd, perhaps: "with her late father", or, later on: "and her feelings about his death".- Done ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
vaguely shares
— perhaps something like, "alludes", to remove any possible negative connotation.- Done ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
(featuring Clairy Browne)
— this would seem useful on the song's first mention, unless I am missing something.- Done ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Violet Chachki says her look
— I initially thought she was referencing Davenport's outfit.- Added "own". ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Verifiable with no original research
A lot of good sources! Looking at the ones of unknown reliability, their about pages, publishers, and what they cite, seem satisfactory. This is a bit silly from WERRRK.com, but yes, they were selected for archive by the Library of Congress, and WP:PLOTCITE also partially applies.
- Compounded with the blockquote, I sense a bit of over-quoting in the "Reception" section. They're part of every sentence! Of course, it shouldn't be too difficult to make some tweaks and work your magic.
- I've done a bit of paraphrasing and also moved the commentary re: fashion by The Guardian to the fashion paragraph under "Production and fashion". ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Gambit Magazine may not be needed as a self-described blog.
- Removed ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Spot-check
- Carpentier, Megan; Rushe, Dominic (2015-05-19). "RuPaul's Drag Race recap: season seven, episode 12 – And the Rest is Drag". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. OCLC 60623878. Archived from the original on 2020-03-22. Retrieved 2024-02-01.</ref>
- Looks good
- Boulet, Ruth (2015-05-19). "RuPaul's Drag Race Season 7 episode 12 recap: Born Naked video". Channel Guide Magazine. Archived from the original on 2024-03-01. Retrieved 2024-03-03.
- Looks good
- Libby, Katie. ""RuPaul's Drag Race" Season 7, Episode 12: And the Rest is a Drag". CITY Magazine. Archived from the original on 2024-02-24. Retrieved 2024-03-03.
- Looks good
- "RuPaul's Drag Race: "And The Rest Is Drag"". The A.V. Club. G/O Media. 2015-05-19. Archived from the original on 2021-06-20. Retrieved 2024-02-01.
- Looks good
- "'RuPaul's Drag Race' recap: 'And the Rest Is a Drag!'". Entertainment Weekly. Dotdash Meredith. ISSN 1049-0434. OCLC 21114137. Archived from the original on 2023-05-29. Retrieved 2024-03-03.
- I'll be lenient towards the "guest judge" and "special guest", but perhaps find a ref for the Emmy, as it's outside the Drag Race franchise. Looks good otherwise.
- "11 Times "RuPaul's Drag Race" Celebrated The Trans Community". Logo TV. Archived from the original on 2023-11-29. Retrieved 2024-03-03.
- Looks good alongside the other ref.
- Ehrman-Dupre, Joe (2015-05-20). "'RuPaul's Drag Race' Recap: Season 7, Episode 12: 'And The Rest Is Drag'". IndieWire. Penske Media Corporation. Archived from the original on 2024-03-03. Retrieved 2024-03-03.
- Looks good
Broad in its coverage
Many hits on Google Scholar and TWL, but upon checking, none of them discuss the episode in any detail, it just seems to be a catchy tagline. Looking through news articles and websites, I can safely say that this article is quite broad.
- I agree that it's an overall benefit, but the 110 words of background on Cameron is a bit distracting. Perhaps the list of episodes could be summarized.
- I've trimmed a bit. I had hoped to include the relevant episode titles, but perhaps that's too much detail? I should note two of the episodes are later mentioned re: Cayne. ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think it looks better, but silly me, sorry for not catching this! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 23:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- No worries! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think it looks better, but silly me, sorry for not catching this! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 23:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've trimmed a bit. I had hoped to include the relevant episode titles, but perhaps that's too much detail? I should note two of the episodes are later mentioned re: Cayne. ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Could you clarify The Guardian's stance on Pearl's and Chachki's outfits? It seems to be positive considering statements like: "...give people a reason to root for you other than the fact that [you wear] corsets tighter than Miss Scarlett herself", and "...so I, like Michelle Visage, applaud [...] all efforts to channel Madonna (now two weeks running!)." Whatever you think works best!
- Also, to segue from their shady first statement about Chachki, would any of their commentary on the contestants' personas, relationships, or exit interviews be worth a mention? Some of it isn't too tied to the episode as a whole, but I'd be interested in your opinion.
- I would say this seems like unnecessary detail. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's fair: it's tricky, because they never really make it about the episode as a whole.
- I would say this seems like unnecessary detail. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Also, to segue from their shady first statement about Chachki, would any of their commentary on the contestants' personas, relationships, or exit interviews be worth a mention? Some of it isn't too tied to the episode as a whole, but I'd be interested in your opinion.
Neutral
Neutral as can be, seemingly no issues.
- Like ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Stable
One revert over due weight and a recent AFD with rough consensus to keep; no major, outstanding issues.
Illustrated
Images are CC licensed from Flickr, own works, VRT confirmed, or public domain. They are quite lovely, I like the Madonna and Sally Bowles pictures for reference. However:
- Consider filling out the "non replacable" paramater in the infobox image.
- Done ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:53, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Summary
@Another Believer: Some starters for now; my other thoughts may be more extensive. Thank you for your continued patience! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 03:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- No problem! Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Averageuntitleduser: I've tried to address your concerns. You'll notice I just created a subsection for Fashion under Production, to follow-up on some of my above comments. Please let me know if any concerns remain. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- I like the sectioning! One teeny source thing. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Averageuntitleduser Thanks! I've added a citation by the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Lovely work! Thanks for sticking with me, I'm now happy to pass this article! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 23:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Averageuntitleduser Thanks! I've added a citation by the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- I like the sectioning! One teeny source thing. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 17:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Averageuntitleduser: I've tried to address your concerns. You'll notice I just created a subsection for Fashion under Production, to follow-up on some of my above comments. Please let me know if any concerns remain. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)