Talk:Biotin deficiency: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:43, 19 June 2023

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Biotin deficiency.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Medicine: Dermatology Start‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Article categorization

This article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad (talk) 23:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References a mess

What is here is a mess. The numbered refs (1-16) are incomplete. After those there is a long list, not numbered, alphabetical, and in all likelihood copied from another source. Some of these are duplicates of the initial 1-16.David notMD (talk) 15:53, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference 16 to biotin deficiency in pregnancy is inaccurate. There is no mention of biotin levels in pregnant patients in the cited publication . The study is a trial of bioavailability of biotin in IV and oral formulations and in fact pregnant patients were excluded from the study. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.131.10.133 (talk) 00:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible References Section

I have gone through the article and added references. Can the "possible references" section at the bottom of the page hence be deleted now? Or should it be left there anyway? BennBluee (talk) 02:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 Reference 16 to biotin deficiency in pregnancy is inaccurate.  There is no mention of biotin levels in pregnant patients in the cited publication . The study is a trial of bioavailability of biotin in IV and oral formulations and in fact pregnant patients were excluded from the study.  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/152.131.10.133|152.131.10.133]] ([[User talk:152.131.10.133#top|talk]]) 00:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Possible References Section ==
+I have gone through the article and added references. Can the "possible references" section at the bottom of the page hence be deleted now? Or should it be left there anyway? [[User:BennBluee|BennBluee]] ([[User talk:BennBluee|talk]]) 02:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC)