Talk:Deworm the World Initiative: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
RegMonkey (talk | contribs)
Line 38: Line 38:


There is now a much larger article for the related organization [[Evidence Action]]. Content here may be redundant. [[User:WeyerStudentOfAgrippa|WeyerStudentOfAgrippa]] ([[User talk:WeyerStudentOfAgrippa|talk]]) 14:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
There is now a much larger article for the related organization [[Evidence Action]]. Content here may be redundant. [[User:WeyerStudentOfAgrippa|WeyerStudentOfAgrippa]] ([[User talk:WeyerStudentOfAgrippa|talk]]) 14:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

:Strongly agree. The [[Deworm the World Initiative]] is now only a program of [[Evidence Action]], so a standalone page is [[WP:REDUNDANT]]. [[User:RegMonkey|RegMonkey]] ([[User talk:RegMonkey|talk]]) 18:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:22, 16 January 2024

WikiProject iconOrganizations Redirect‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEffective Altruism NA‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Effective Altruism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relevant to effective altruism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Response to request for attention by an expert in medicine

Not sure why this needs an expert in medicine. This entry refers to work of a nonprofit initiative. It refers to the factual work of the program. External links are appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.153.192.4 (talk) 16:54, 29 July 2015‎

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Deworm the World Initiative. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion Suggestion

Keep & improve: Yes this is a poorly referenced page but only the final section could be perceived as promotional (although it is referenced). However, the subject matter is highly notable, they conducted one of the world's largest drug treatment programmes in Bihar India, deworming 17mn children. I think it would be better to reduce the page length and improve with a few non-primary references and build from there rather than delete.

Some non-primary references:

  • [1] - Showing this initiative ranked 6th globally in terms of charity effectiveness
  • [2] - Huffington Post interview by Emma Watson noting the initiative
  • [3] A BMJ article critiquing their approach
  • [4] - journal from Biomed Central detailing support to Kenyan government national deworming.
  • [5] - PLOS journal detailing support to deworm 17mn children in Bihar, India.

I would argue an article with these good quality references added to the primary sources already there, removing some of the 'Givewell' overkill would leave a healthy little article.

--Mountaincirque 10:15, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Potential merge with Evidence Action (Jan 2024)

There is now a much larger article for the related organization Evidence Action. Content here may be redundant. WeyerStudentOfAgrippa (talk) 14:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly agree. The Deworm the World Initiative is now only a program of Evidence Action, so a standalone page is WP:REDUNDANT. RegMonkey (talk) 18:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]