Talk:Dilute Russell's viper venom time: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
m CambridgeBayWeather moved page Talk:Dilute Russell's Viper Venom Time to Talk:Dilute Russell's viper venom time over redirect: Change to sentence case (MOS:AT): As per source
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 21:56, 29 April 2024

Besides one or more solid references for this article, it would be nice if some history could be added as well (with references): who first devised this test, how, where and when? --Jwinius 20:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How the test works[edit]

OK, lets try to settle down the edit conflicts. The point of this test is that it is a clotting assay which is very dependant on the availability of phospholipid for its activity. Thus, substances which alter the availability of phospholipid to the other clotting factors, most notably lupus anticoagulants, cause a prolongation in clotting in this assay, which can be reversed by adding more phospholipid. I think that's clear from the ref, if not entirely spelled out in a single sentence or paragraph. -RustavoTalk/Contribs 18:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi There, This article definitely needs an update since the references are quite old and the "original" multi-step method superceded. I have been involved with this test since its introduction and have added relevant history. I'm not sure that you need a medico for the mechanism section but rather a laboratory scientist who knows how the test works. I'll have ago at that. The section on clinical significance is still OK despite being quite old.Texner43 (talk) 04:28, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]