Talk:Enterprise Building (China): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:52, 14 October 2023

Architecture Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Enterprise-E

I removed the assertion the building looks like the Enterprise-E -- neither of the two non-paywall sources point to that specific version. If an editor has access to the WSJ item, perhaps use the quote field on the citation template to capture that assertion. I think unless we can cite that connection here, it shouldn't be added -- and the echoing assertion at the Enterprise-E article should also go away. But figure I'd raise the topic here first. --EEMIV (talk) 23:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind: a different source cited on the page (I hadn't realize they're basically alllll about the Enterprise resemblance) draws a line to the E-E. --EEMIV (talk) 23:52, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 23:50, 14 October 2023 edit EEMIV (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 50,952 edits →‎Enterprise-E: new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:52, 14 October 2023 edit undo EEMIV (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 50,952 edits →‎Enterprise-E Tag: 2017 wikitext editor Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I removed the assertion the building looks like the ''Enterprise''-E -- neither of the two non-paywall sources point to that specific version. If an editor has access to the WSJ item, perhaps use the ''quote'' field on the citation template to capture that assertion. I think unless we can cite that connection here, it shouldn't be added -- and the echoing assertion at the ''Enterprise''-E article should also go away. But figure I'd raise the topic here first. --[[User:EEMIV\|EEMIV]] ([[User talk:EEMIV\|talk]]) 23:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC)		I removed the assertion the building looks like the ''Enterprise''-E -- neither of the two non-paywall sources point to that specific version. If an editor has access to the WSJ item, perhaps use the ''quote'' field on the citation template to capture that assertion. I think unless we can cite that connection here, it shouldn't be added -- and the echoing assertion at the ''Enterprise''-E article should also go away. But figure I'd raise the topic here first. --[[User:EEMIV\|EEMIV]] ([[User talk:EEMIV\|talk]]) 23:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

			:Never mind: a different source cited on the page (I hadn't realize they're basically ''alllll'' about the ''Enterprise'' resemblance) draws a line to the E-E. --[[User:EEMIV\|EEMIV]] ([[User talk:EEMIV\|talk]]) 23:52, 14 October 2023 (UTC)