Talk:Keystone Pipeline

Energy C‑class Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Energy portal news

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Canada or the United States may be able to help!

Keystone Pipeline through Kansas

I'm confused why people were protesting this pipeline in Topeka, Kansas on September 26, 2011, because I thought there was ONLY one pipeline segment that ran through Kansas. The pipeline was buried in Kansas LAST YEAR (2010) and completed to Cushing, Oklahoma in February 2011. My confusion is why are they whining in Kansas when the pipeline is already completed through the state? They aren't digging another pipeline in Kansas, right? • Sbmeirow • Talk • 04:15, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Keystone Pipeline System document. It doesn't state anything about building a 2nd pipeline through Kansas. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 07:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article had a bunch of mistakes because it was written back in 2008. I correct some mistakes and split the routing into phases to match the TransCanada PDF document. I added a Cushing infobox and renamed the pipelines to match the TransCanada PDF document. The article needs MORE fixing to match the phases and cleanup of old or out-of-date information. Please help! • Sbmeirow • Talk • 05:52, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

News Articles

TransCanada Pipeline Foes See U.S. Bias in E-Mails by Elisabeth Rosenthal, published October 3, 2011 in The New York Times
EPA Seeks Expanded Review of Proposed Oil Sands Pipeline by Elana Schor of Greenwire, published June 7, 2011
Reliance on Oil Sands Grows Despite Environmental Risks by Clifford Krauss and Elizabeth Rosenthal, published May 18, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/science/earth/inquiry-into-keystone-xl-pipeline-permit-process.html 97.87.29.188 (talk) 23:09, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pipeline Protesters Form Human Chain Around White House by Tennille Tracy Wall Street Journal NOVEMBER 6, 2011, 6:01 P.M. ET

resource

Encircle the White House Nov. 6 by Bill McKibben (an organizer with http://www.tarsandsaction.org) October 20, 2011 in The Progressive; excerpt ...

... even though an analysis from the Cornell University Global Labour Institute shows the pipeline will probably kill as many jobs as it creates. ... reporting by the New York Times in mid-October, showed that the State Department had allowed Transcanada Pipeline to nominate the company that should evaluate its project. First on their list was a firm called Entrix, and the State Department helpfully picked them to run the process—which is shabby enough. But if you go to the Entrix website, you discover that Transcanada is … a “major client.” It simply doesn’t get sleazier than this; the Times has called it a “flouting of environmental law.” It’s more like a poster child for Occupy Wall Street;...

99.109.126.73 (talk) 22:14, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]