Talk:Martensville satanic sex scandal: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Hob Gadling (talk | contribs) |
→Rename article: comment |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Yup. There was undoubtedly a scandal, but no evidence of any 'satanic sex' being involved. I'm sure that Wikipedia policy on article names doesn't encourage the use of titles which imply that something happened, only for the article itself to state that it didn't. [[Special:Contributions/109.156.239.85|109.156.239.85]] ([[User talk:109.156.239.85|talk]]) 21:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC) |
:Yup. There was undoubtedly a scandal, but no evidence of any 'satanic sex' being involved. I'm sure that Wikipedia policy on article names doesn't encourage the use of titles which imply that something happened, only for the article itself to state that it didn't. [[Special:Contributions/109.156.239.85|109.156.239.85]] ([[User talk:109.156.239.85|talk]]) 21:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
::Right, but [[hysteria]] is not a good word to use either. Maybe "panic" is better? But the aricle itself says "also known as the Martensville Nightmare", so maybe that is the best. I'll ask at [[WP:FTN]]. --[[User:Hob Gadling|Hob Gadling]] ([[User talk:Hob Gadling|talk]]) 00:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC) |
::Right, but [[hysteria]] is not a good word to use either. Maybe "panic" is better? But the aricle itself says "also known as the Martensville Nightmare", so maybe that is the best. I'll ask at [[WP:FTN]]. --[[User:Hob Gadling|Hob Gadling]] ([[User talk:Hob Gadling|talk]]) 00:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
:::I don't think 'nightmare' is appropriate in a title either. Not unless it is what the article is about, rather than a metaphor. "Martensville satanic sex allegations" might work, I suppose. [[Special:Contributions/109.156.239.85|109.156.239.85]] ([[User talk:109.156.239.85|talk]]) 05:30, 15 April 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:30, 15 April 2020
Canada: Saskatchewan Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Rename article
Article should be renamed to "Martensville satanic sex hysteria" -- 62.225.62.67 (talk) 17:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Yup. There was undoubtedly a scandal, but no evidence of any 'satanic sex' being involved. I'm sure that Wikipedia policy on article names doesn't encourage the use of titles which imply that something happened, only for the article itself to state that it didn't. 109.156.239.85 (talk) 21:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Right, but hysteria is not a good word to use either. Maybe "panic" is better? But the aricle itself says "also known as the Martensville Nightmare", so maybe that is the best. I'll ask at WP:FTN. --Hob Gadling (talk) 00:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think 'nightmare' is appropriate in a title either. Not unless it is what the article is about, rather than a metaphor. "Martensville satanic sex allegations" might work, I suppose. 109.156.239.85 (talk) 05:30, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Right, but hysteria is not a good word to use either. Maybe "panic" is better? But the aricle itself says "also known as the Martensville Nightmare", so maybe that is the best. I'll ask at WP:FTN. --Hob Gadling (talk) 00:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)