Talk:Phosphorus cycle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Planetary boundaries: reasons not to add
Scientific American article are based on other citations internal in Scientific American articles already. Moot. Continue on Talk:Planetary boundaries?
Line 15: Line 15:
:::Resource for [[Planetary boundaries]]: [http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=boundaries-for-a-healthy-planet "Boundaries for a Healthy Planet"] by Jonathan Foley, Gretchen C. Daily, Robert Howarth, David A. Vaccari, Adele C. Morris, Eric F. Lambin, Scott C. Doney, Peter H. Gleick and David W. Fahey [[Scientific American]] April 2010 [[Special:Contributions/99.190.85.150|99.190.85.150]] ([[User talk:99.190.85.150|talk]]) 19:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
:::Resource for [[Planetary boundaries]]: [http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=boundaries-for-a-healthy-planet "Boundaries for a Healthy Planet"] by Jonathan Foley, Gretchen C. Daily, Robert Howarth, David A. Vaccari, Adele C. Morris, Eric F. Lambin, Scott C. Doney, Peter H. Gleick and David W. Fahey [[Scientific American]] April 2010 [[Special:Contributions/99.190.85.150|99.190.85.150]] ([[User talk:99.190.85.150|talk]]) 19:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
::::You're advertising the topic, just as you were advertising [[350.org]] when I first noticed you. A separate source commenting on the notability of the the article [[planetary boundaries]] should be needed. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 19:19, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
::::You're advertising the topic, just as you were advertising [[350.org]] when I first noticed you. A separate source commenting on the notability of the the article [[planetary boundaries]] should be needed. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 19:19, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
:::::[[Scientific American]] article are based on other citations internal in Scientific American articles already, see above article. Moot. Continue on [[Talk:Planetary boundaries]]? [[Special:Contributions/99.119.128.35|99.119.128.35]] ([[User talk:99.119.128.35|talk]]) 21:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:42, 30 March 2011

WikiProject iconEcology Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconSoil Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconPhosphorus cycle is within the scope of WikiProject Soil, which collaborates on Soil and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Cleanup taskforce closed If anyone can add or cleanup this article, please do. Ecology's really not my thing; I only wrote this to stop people from creating nonsense articles here. — Knowledge Seeker 06:24, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Diagram

Would benefit from a diagram of the complete P cycle, with more detailed labelling and process information Jebus989 (talk) 16:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Planetary boundaries

Add The amount of phosphorous per year released into the oceans is a Planetary boundaries metric. 99.19.46.34 (talk) 03:48, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:29, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why, what? 99.109.126.34 (talk) 17:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resource for Planetary boundaries: "Boundaries for a Healthy Planet" by Jonathan Foley, Gretchen C. Daily, Robert Howarth, David A. Vaccari, Adele C. Morris, Eric F. Lambin, Scott C. Doney, Peter H. Gleick and David W. Fahey Scientific American April 2010 99.190.85.150 (talk) 19:03, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're advertising the topic, just as you were advertising 350.org when I first noticed you. A separate source commenting on the notability of the the article planetary boundaries should be needed. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:19, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Scientific American article are based on other citations internal in Scientific American articles already, see above article. Moot. Continue on Talk:Planetary boundaries? 99.119.128.35 (talk) 21:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]