Talk:Stawiski: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 7: Line 7:
I've [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stawiski&diff=847297861&oldid=846042386 reverted] this edit, which restored the 27 August 2017 version, restoring the stable version from March 2018. This version is very poorly sourced, and misrepresents the sources it uses - many of which do not cover Stawiski and/or do not contain the stmts attributed to them. Please discuss here.[[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] ([[User talk:Icewhiz|talk]]) 09:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
I've [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stawiski&diff=847297861&oldid=846042386 reverted] this edit, which restored the 27 August 2017 version, restoring the stable version from March 2018. This version is very poorly sourced, and misrepresents the sources it uses - many of which do not cover Stawiski and/or do not contain the stmts attributed to them. Please discuss here.[[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] ([[User talk:Icewhiz|talk]]) 09:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
: What was poorly sourced? Could you elaborate?[[User:GizzyCatBella|GizzyCatBella]] ([[User talk:GizzyCatBella|talk]]) 09:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
: What was poorly sourced? Could you elaborate?[[User:GizzyCatBella|GizzyCatBella]] ([[User talk:GizzyCatBella|talk]]) 09:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
:: {{ping|GizzyCatBella}} I strongly suggest you self revert - you've restored several sources that do not refer to the town (e.g. Rossino - who simply doesn't say what you are restoring), and have introduced highly defamatory and counter-factual information in Wikipedia's voice. The stable version is from 19 March. I will be taking this to AE if you don't self revert.[[User:Icewhiz|Icewhiz]] ([[User talk:Icewhiz|talk]]) 09:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:30, 24 June 2018

WikiProject iconPoland Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

17 February 2014

I added some citation tags to the article. Reference number 4 is a blog. Can it be considered a credible source? Furthermore, the conclusions drawn from this blog entry are only loosely based on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.177.105.203 (talk) 10:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

I've reverted this edit, which restored the 27 August 2017 version, restoring the stable version from March 2018. This version is very poorly sourced, and misrepresents the sources it uses - many of which do not cover Stawiski and/or do not contain the stmts attributed to them. Please discuss here.Icewhiz (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What was poorly sourced? Could you elaborate?GizzyCatBella (talk) 09:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@GizzyCatBella: I strongly suggest you self revert - you've restored several sources that do not refer to the town (e.g. Rossino - who simply doesn't say what you are restoring), and have introduced highly defamatory and counter-factual information in Wikipedia's voice. The stable version is from 19 March. I will be taking this to AE if you don't self revert.Icewhiz (talk) 09:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]