Talk:Wisdom literature: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:46, 20 June 2020

Bible C‑class High‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religious texts C‑class (defunct)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Judaism C‑class High‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Literature C‑class High‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

crosslinking to German

needs crosslinking to German Weisheitsliteratur: i have no idea how that is done

You put [[de:Weisheitsliteratur]] at the end --Henrygb 16:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Sapiential Books to here

Merged Sapiential Books to here. - 74.138.110.32 (talk) 03:52, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Israel

What is exactly Israel here? Israelites? Hebrew literature?

Anglo-Saxon 'wisdom literature'

There is a large field of discussion about 'wisdom literature' in Anglo-Saxon corpus that is appropriate to include here

See for reference:

-Gnomic Poetry In anglosaxon Issue 49 , Blanche Colton Williams -The Solomon Complex , Elaine Tuttle Hansen - Job, ecclesiastes, and the mechanics of wisdom in Old English Poetry - Lyric gnome in old English poetry

Note, the Americans seem to dislike Anglo-Saxon due to their perceived personal history with the term. In England however the term is acceptable. I think old English is more common for describing the literature though, its a matter of taste I guess. Its pretty much synonymous in usage.

CantingCrew (talk) 21:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)CantingCrew[reply]

Revision as of 21:46, 20 June 2020 edit CantingCrew (talk \| contribs) 67 edits →‎Anglo-Saxon 'wisdom literature': new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:46, 20 June 2020 edit undo CantingCrew (talk \| contribs) 67 edits →‎Anglo-Saxon 'wisdom literature' Next edit →
Line 32:		Line 32:

	Note, the Americans seem to dislike Anglo-Saxon due to their perceived personal history with the term. In England however the term is acceptable. I think old English is more common for describing the literature though, its a matter of taste I guess. Its pretty much synonymous in usage.		Note, the Americans seem to dislike Anglo-Saxon due to their perceived personal history with the term. In England however the term is acceptable. I think old English is more common for describing the literature though, its a matter of taste I guess. Its pretty much synonymous in usage.

			[[User:CantingCrew\|CantingCrew]] ([[User talk:CantingCrew\|talk]]) 21:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)CantingCrew