User:MrX

MrX

MrX	talk	articles	photos

experience

This editor is a
Master Editor IV
and is entitled to display this
Orichalcum Editor Star.

This user has been on Wikipedia for 14 years, 8 months and 9 days.

This user has created 189 articles on Wikipedia.

This user received the Editor of the Week award.

This user has uploaded 1 Featured picture on Wikipedia.

enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.

fr-2Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau intermédiaire en français.

About MrX

I am a Wikipedia editor whose simple goal is to help expand this global repository of free information. I create and edit articles about which I have some subject matter interest, or that I believe could benefit from my help. I have edited Wikipedia since at least June 23, 2006 as an IP user. I registered in 2009, and became active in 2011. I'm proud to be a member of this community and I'm continually inspired by many of the excellent contributors here on Wikipedia.

Principles

I strive to work collaboratively with the other members of the Wikipedia community. If, however, I have offended, please accept my apology and please let me know so that I can try to prevent doing so in the future.

I make plenty of mistakes, but I also try to learn from them. Thanks in advance for your patience.

Alternate accounts

I have two alternate accounts MrExternal (talk · contribs) and MrX Test (talk · contribs) for editing on non-secure networks and for testing.

Barnstars

Committed identity: 357D824CC0F2BDBBC5A3E4781C3771751693F198959A1A9E9D578D4B8AA118BA83D05972E29F268DCF863935DAC6DE86AA3F0C16391335A81769BB5057744789 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

Inappropriate editing on articles and their talk pages

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tulsi Gabbard 2020 presidential campaign, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

@MrX:, regarding your reverts [1] [2] [3] of long standing content created by various editors: Neither the arguments in your edit summaries nor your argument [4] on the talk page discussion hold up to examination [5] of the sources you dispute, or when compared to Wikipedia policies/guidelines. Therefore your were deleting the pertinent cited additions of others. While I have been listening very carefully to all objections and discussed every objection in detail [6] [7] [8] and continuously improve my contributions from preceding versions [9] and adapt them [10] to objections of other editors, you have not tried to fix the problem via repairing the article content you find problematic and you did not propose an alternative text version to the content you object against. You persistently reject reliable sources because the are allegdly "not reliable" or "poor" or "biased" or "misinformation".[11] [12] [13] [14] my reply [15] [16] [17] [18] This amounts to disputing the reliability of apparently good sources. You also claimed [19], my reliable sources were ineligible because written by Gabbard fans. And you also claimed [20] Who cares who commented in Gabbard's defense [against Hillary Clinton's "Russian asset" accusations]?. And you claimed, sources who write about a media bias against Gabbard were not reliable sources: [21]. These three claims amount to political censorship. This pattern regarding sources also amounts to unreasonable sourcing demands [22]. You did not respond to me when I asked you [23] for a text proposal and reasoning for your vague article edit request this article should reflect the reality that her campaign simply had very little impact on the political landscape. Your non-reponse amounts to ignoring good faith questions. Your article edits and talk page comments seem to be tendentious and creating a WP:STONEWALL against my bold editing in the article. Please don't do that. Xenagoras (talk) 23:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)