User talk:Dhruv2357

October 2013

This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

Dhruv2357 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

new username (talk · account availability check · rename user)

Request reason:

Dhruv is my name. And 2357 is a unique number attach to it. I dont understamd what is wrong with it... LOL Dhruv2357 (talk) 04:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Dhruv2357}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=new username | 3=Dhruv is my name. And 2357 is a unique number attach to it. I dont understamd what is wrong with it... LOL Dhruv2357 (talk) 04:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | 4=~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=new username | reason=Dhruv is my name. And 2357 is a unique number attach to it. I dont understamd what is wrong with it... LOL Dhruv2357 (talk) 04:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=new username | reason=Dhruv is my name. And 2357 is a unique number attach to it. I dont understamd what is wrong with it... LOL Dhruv2357 (talk) 04:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC) | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

(talk page stalker) I am not an administrator but according to the "block log," "active blocks," and "autoblocks" links in the blue-green box above, there are no current blocks that affect you and your account has never been specifically blocked. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 04:43, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Smsarmad. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Terrorism seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SMS ^Talk 11:24, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder, you may be blocked from editing. Nigel Ish (talk) 14:06, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Inter-Services Intelligence, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SMS ^Talk 18:16, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Smsarmad, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mar4d (talk) 15:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Mar4d (talk) 16:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to . Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to conduct yourself as you have at Inter-Services Intelligence, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. -- SMS ^Talk 08:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)