User talk:Gala19000

Removal of citation needed template

If a fellow user asks for a citation, the process is search for a reliable source, add it and remove the template. Each other action is consider disruptive. The expression "well known" is POV: in this case something can be well known for a Turk, but not for others. Thanks, Alex2006 (talk) 15:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turkification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Turkish Naval Forces, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Caution for unsourced inflation of numbers and unexplained removal of content, with a deliberately misleading edit summary. Thomas.W ^talk 10:57, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

18 December 2015

Your recent editing history at Article shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Also you are vandalising articles. I'm adding extra sources and please don't remove them or you will be reported in ANI. Thank you!

Please be aware

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Étienne Dolet (talk) 00:33, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

You are removing Turkish Hezbollah from other forces of Turkey because it is in Turkey's terrorist list. Turkey added Turkish Hezbollah to its terrorist list much later. Also, PKK's other forces section includes groups that it is fighting now, for example Kurdish Hezbollah. There is not sense in your changes. Also, I told you HIK doesn't include sources or texts that could proof that they have worked with PKK. Please use talk page. Ferakp (talk) 16:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Very interesting. According to your logic, we should add ISIS in the list as well. Hezbollah is and remains a terror group and do not belong in the list. Because they fought for a time in their own for the government doesn't mean that they are a force of the turkish government. And once again, this whole Turkey-pkk conflict article is not only about the pkk but many other kurdish groups as well hence they also call it a turkish-kurdish or Turkey-kurdish conflict. Please, read the articles better and do some more research. Thanks.

January 2016

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ferakp (talk) 17:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Great to know that there is a discussion. You can now stop spamming me with this and read the articles better by yourself

Very interesting. According to your logic, we should add ISIS in the list as well. Hezbollah is and remains a terror group and do not belong in the list. Because they fought for a time in their own for the government doesn't mean that they are a force of the turkish government. And once again, this whole Turkey-pkk conflict article is not only about the pkk but many other kurdish groups as well hence they also call it a turkish-kurdish or Turkey-kurdish conflict. Please, read the articles better and do some more research. Thanks.

ISIS has nothing to do with Turkey-PKK conflict. Hezbollah was working with Turkey and it should be in the list, because it is also in the PKK's list. Why did you add it to PKK's other forces list? Also, remember that it is Turkish Hezbollah not Kurdish Hezbollah even it is called so. Official name in books and publications is Turkish Hezbullah and majority of its members are ethnic Turks. "...mean that they are a force of the turkish government.." If you think that it should be a force of the Turkey, then shouldn't all other forces of PKK be also "forces" of PKK? Your logic... ".. only about the pkk but many other kurdish groups as well hence they also..." Yeah it is also called Turkish-Kurdish conflict so all Turkish organizations that have fought against the PKK should be included. Why did you delete my citation needed tags? You have said continuously read the main article and nothing else? Why don't you read the main article and bring source from it to the article. I have tried to tell you 5 times that there is no source and that is why citation needed should be there until you or someone else have found a source for it. It looks like you have involved in too many edit wars... Ferakp (talk) 17:21, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

I don't think that you understand me at all. The reason why I added the Turkish(kurdish) hezbollah has to do with the fact that this article includes most, if not all kurdish insurgent groups who are fighting against the government. The reason of why adding the hezbollah group on the turkish side is wrong has to do with the fact that they never had full co operation with the government nor did they fought that long with them. They more had the function of the enemy of my enemy is my friend thing. And about the citation thing, if you for just once would do some research you would have known the the MKP and many other communist/leftist groups have strong ties with each other including the pkk. Thats domethingd almost everyone knows in Turkey. And again about the other forces section, they are not a part of the government nor the country, so it makes no sense to add them at all.

Eastern Europe

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Katie^talk 21:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)