User talk:Guerillero: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 41: Line 41:
What do you think of this? [[User:François Robere|François Robere]] ([[User talk:François Robere|talk]]) 19:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
What do you think of this? [[User:François Robere|François Robere]] ([[User talk:François Robere|talk]]) 19:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
:From what I can tell GizzyCatBella edited the article before you did. On talk they've only responded to other editors, not you. However, strangely enough, one of these editors, one who agrees with you about everything, Mhorg, always seems to bring up your name in their replies to Gizzy. Weird, huh? It's ... as if... they wanted Gizzy to respond to a comment that has your username in it or something. On purpose.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Volunteer Marek|<span style="color:orange;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Volunteer Marek '''</span>]]</span></small> 06:42, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
:From what I can tell GizzyCatBella edited the article before you did. On talk they've only responded to other editors, not you. However, strangely enough, one of these editors, one who agrees with you about everything, Mhorg, always seems to bring up your name in their replies to Gizzy. Weird, huh? It's ... as if... they wanted Gizzy to respond to a comment that has your username in it or something. On purpose.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Volunteer Marek|<span style="color:orange;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Volunteer Marek '''</span>]]</span></small> 06:42, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
:: Volunteer Marek, the last time you approached Guerillero was in 2014.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=639892347] How did you learn about this message? Are you following me again?
:* Volunteer Marek, the last time you approached Guerillero was in 2014.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=639892347] How did you learn about my message?
:: [[WP:IBAN]] forbids making references to an editor one is banned from interacting with. Guess what? That's ''my'' thread. These are ''my'' proposals. Saying "we don't have consensus" or "I agree with Marek" - about what? About ''my'' proposals. That's a blunt IBAN violation. [[User:François Robere|François Robere]] ([[User talk:François Robere|talk]]) 09:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
:* [[WP:IBAN]] forbids making references to an editor one is banned from interacting with. That's my thread, these are my proposals; saying "we don't have consensus" or "I agree with Marek" - about what? About this! That's a blunt IBAN violation however you turn it
:* Your accusation against Mhorg is factually wrong - they've only done this twice,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=1032928398&diffmode=source][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=1033746782&diffmode=source] and in both cases they were on-point. In your first comment you accused them of trying to "turn the article into an attack page",[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jan_%C5%BBaryn&diff=1020036665&oldid=901587882] and in your sixth - of "indirect canvassing".[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jan_%C5%BBaryn&diff=1020169763&oldid=1020169449&diffmode=source] They were gracious enough to suggest you take them to a second SPI.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=1030093001&diffmode=source] After so many warning against bad faith (including two in the last month [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_policy_of_the_Law_and_Justice_party&diff=1029342805&oldid=1029341582&diffmode=source][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=1032633537&oldid=1032630277&diffmode=source]), and here you go again. [[User:François Robere|François Robere]] ([[User talk:François Robere|talk]]) 09:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:56, 16 July 2021

I-ban

Hey Guerillero,

Several weeks ago I started a discussion at Jan Żaryn which centers around one of my edits. A person who has a 2-way I-ban with me (which you imposed) participated in the discussion, commenting several times on my proposals and on the discussion itself. I don't believe persons who are banned from interacting with me are allowed to opine on my proposals, count themselves towards a consensus on my proposals, or opine on someone's analysis of sources that I brought to the table. If I ask a question and you reply with "I agree with what John wrote", then you're replying to my question whether you say so explicitly or not.

What do you think of this? François Robere (talk) 19:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From what I can tell GizzyCatBella edited the article before you did. On talk they've only responded to other editors, not you. However, strangely enough, one of these editors, one who agrees with you about everything, Mhorg, always seems to bring up your name in their replies to Gizzy. Weird, huh? It's ... as if... they wanted Gizzy to respond to a comment that has your username in it or something. On purpose. Volunteer Marek 06:42, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Volunteer Marek, the last time you approached Guerillero was in 2014.[1] How did you learn about my message?
  • WP:IBAN forbids making references to an editor one is banned from interacting with. That's my thread, these are my proposals; saying "we don't have consensus" or "I agree with Marek" - about what? About this! That's a blunt IBAN violation however you turn it
  • Your accusation against Mhorg is factually wrong - they've only done this twice,[2][3] and in both cases they were on-point. In your first comment you accused them of trying to "turn the article into an attack page",[4] and in your sixth - of "indirect canvassing".[5] They were gracious enough to suggest you take them to a second SPI.[6] After so many warning against bad faith (including two in the last month [7][8]), and here you go again. François Robere (talk) 09:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]