User talk:Marokwitz: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SlimVirgin (talk | contribs)
→‎1RR: new section
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 32: Line 32:


You've violated 1RR at the Lydda article, first by restoring your Hebrew information, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1948_Palestinian_exodus_from_Lydda_and_Ramle&action=historysubmit&diff=400623246&oldid=400478315] then by restoring your Kadish/Sela text. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1948_Palestinian_exodus_from_Lydda_and_Ramle&action=historysubmit&diff=400674849&oldid=400673692] You may wish to take the opportunity to revert yourself. <font color="blue">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|contribs]]</font></sup></small> 16:13, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
You've violated 1RR at the Lydda article, first by restoring your Hebrew information, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1948_Palestinian_exodus_from_Lydda_and_Ramle&action=historysubmit&diff=400623246&oldid=400478315] then by restoring your Kadish/Sela text. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1948_Palestinian_exodus_from_Lydda_and_Ramle&action=historysubmit&diff=400674849&oldid=400673692] You may wish to take the opportunity to revert yourself. <font color="blue">[[User:SlimVirgin|SlimVirgin]]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|talk|]]</font><font color="green">[[Special:Contributions/SlimVirgin|contribs]]</font></sup></small> 16:13, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
:I'm not that familiar with wikilawyering, so I can't comment on the 1rr, but FWIW I also oppose your removal of the content as I explained on the talk page. I would also like to second the concerns raised there about your misleading summaries. I recall distinctly discussing this with you on a previous occasions and I also have a vague recollection of some sort of arbcom reprimand for misleading edit summaries. Please correct me if I am wrong.--''[[User:Brewcrewer|<span style="font family:Arial;color:green">brew</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Brewcrewer|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#2E82F4">crewer</span>]] [[User talk:Brewcrewer|(yada, yada)]]'' 16:37, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:38, 5 December 2010

Since your first edit to Jewish control of the media was to change its name, I don't know if you will ever bother to read the talk page where I wrote:

Let's keep the issue narrow to Wikipedia policy on Wikipedia:Article titles and Wikipedia:Content forking. Someone has changed the name of the article to Jewish control of the media (Antisemitic canard) to get around the fact that is the least used phrase describing it. So they think that there should be another separate one for myth and a separate one for conspiracy? (And that all information not directly calling something a "canard" should be removed? Which it will have to be, especially in WP:BLPs.) That sounds like something someone who didn't want the issue explored would do.

CarolMooreDC (talk) 15:52, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for alerting me to the discussion, I replied there. Marokwitz (talk) 16:05, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

חַג חֲנֻכָּה שָׂמֵחַ

הַנֵּרוֹת הַלָּלוּ קֹדֶשׁ הֵם

Hi Marokwitz! Hoping you and yours are spiritually warmed by the holy lights of
חֲנֻכָּה

Keep up the good work! Chesdovi 2010

Scary graphics :) ... Thank you, and happy Hanukka to you. Marokwitz (talk) 06:11, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1RR

You've violated 1RR at the Lydda article, first by restoring your Hebrew information, [1] then by restoring your Kadish/Sela text. [2] You may wish to take the opportunity to revert yourself. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 16:13, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not that familiar with wikilawyering, so I can't comment on the 1rr, but FWIW I also oppose your removal of the content as I explained on the talk page. I would also like to second the concerns raised there about your misleading summaries. I recall distinctly discussing this with you on a previous occasions and I also have a vague recollection of some sort of arbcom reprimand for misleading edit summaries. Please correct me if I am wrong.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 16:37, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]