User talk:Monlonet

Mount Ararat

Hi Monlonet, I appreciate your additions to the Mount Ararat article. But can you please discuss them on the article Talk page before you add them? I don't think Tacentral.com is considered a reliable source (at least not yet) by Wikipedia. So until that is established, or if you can find another reliable source to back the claims of the etymology of "Ararat" then we can add this information. Please use the discussion page for the Mount Ararat article. Best, Serouj (talk) 18:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Armenian TV shows aren't enough... Those specific books, their authors, page numbers, and actual quotes from the books need to be used... While it does make sense that "Ararat" in the Bible is after an Armenian name, this needs to be shown using reliable sources... Serouj (talk) 01:42, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

quoting from "books" alone isn't enough either. You need to review WP:RS. Obviously, you are going to find many hilarious claims in books like Armenia, Subartu And Sumer. But while such sources can considered primary sources for discussions of ethnic nationalism, they cannot be used as secondary sources for the simple reason that they have no academic credibility. If you desperately want to believe something, you will always find some book telling you exactly what ou ant to hear. But this isn't intellectual honesty, and it has nothing to do with the purpose of an encyclopedia, which is trying to present expert opinion on what is plausible and what is not. --dab (𒁳) 14:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

AA2

Hi. Please be familiar with Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 before further reverts. Thank you. Brand[t] 12:39, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

3RR

Your recent editing history at Duduk shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Grandmaster 20:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

WP:AE

Please see this report at WP:AE: [1] Grandmaster 17:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)