User talk:Whpq

Image discussion at article 17 Mile Drive

A discussion is underway about images on an article you have contributed to. Please help find a consensus for the article stub at: Talk:17-Mile Drive#17 Mile Drive info box and section images replacement.--Amadscientist (talk) 05:52, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Vell Retiza Baria

Note the user has redone her userpage, and it is no longer fakearticlish, since there is only you and Supermarioman participating, I am happy to close the discussion if he withdraws his nomination and you change your position. If you want to let it run it's course, no worries by me. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 07:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Djdubay (6 pages)

Group 1: Redirects to pages already deleted from a U1 request: (would be a G6 request if they were not User talk pages)

• User talk:Djdubay/Human Anatomy project
• User talk:Djdubay/Lexicography project
• User talk:Djdubay/sandbox/Transparent Men project
• User talk:Djdubay/sandbox/old Human Anatomy project

Group 2: Test edits that have been blanked, and would have been deleted under U1 or G7 but for the fact that they're User talk pages:

• User talk:Djdubay/sandbox
• User talk:Djdubay/sandbox/Human Anatomy/Old project

Of course, User talk:Djdubay should remain untouched, as there is actual talk recorded.

In Part I of the instructions, it says to use "{{mfd|GroupName}} if nominating several related pages in an umbrella nomination."

but then in Part II, it only says to use "{{subst:mfd2| pg={{subst:#titleparts:{{subst:PAGENAME}}||2}}| text=Reason why the page should be deleted}}" with no further use of "GroupName" anywhere in the text. Perhaps it should be "subst:PAGENAME or GroupName"?

When I came to Part III, it became clear that "{{subst:mfd3| pg=PageName}} should refer to "pg=PageName or GroupName". Whatever the correct procedure should be, the instructions should be updated accordingly, to avoid this sort of problem. Thanks for your help!

Djdubay (talk) 17:02, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Replied at User talk:Djdubay to keep the discussion organized. -- Whpq (talk) 17:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Whpq. You have new messages at Djdubay's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi!

Just noticed that you voted twice at the Karlsson AFD. Yours, Quis separabit? 16:16, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me. That's an astounding brain fart on my part. -- Whpq (talk) 16:24, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Need some advice

Hi, Whpq. A few months ago we tried to create an article for GenMyModel and it hasn't been accepted. We deeply apologize for the inconvenience, and we would really like to respect every rules, so here are a few links that might be interesting. Could you tell me if those sources would be reliable enough for a Wikipedia article? Mark viking already helped me a few weeks ago about a few sources, but we have other ones today and I would really like to have the point of view of someone else. Thanks for your time!

Here are the links:

• This article on a french IT news website: Programmez.com
• This article by the INRIA: INRIA
• This blog post by a software architect: Code painter
• This scientific article published in an official journal and written by one of our collaborators: lirmm.fr
• These articles on famous chinese sites: Developer.51cto.com and CSDN.net
• This review on the Cloudapp spotlight on Developer.com: CloudApp Spotlight
• This article on a quite visited Indian blog: Sudobits
• This tutorial made by an online IDE provider: Codenvy Docs
• And this updated article on a well-known website in our field (already used as a source for the "Modeling Languages" article: Modeling-languages

Thank you very much! Simdup (talk) 08:02, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

• Reply - I'd say that this helps move towards notability but the material is still either unreliable, not independent, not very substantial, or looks like a press release re-hash. If it continues to garner attention, it will probably meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria in the future, but it still doesn't look like it meets it right now. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 00:50, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I guess we will be waiting to have some more material. Thank you very much for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simdup (talk • contribs) 07:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aaron Nelson-Moody, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Red cedar and Coast Salish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Whpq. You have new messages at Yworo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

David Mahmoudieh

Hi Whpq,

Reviewing some of the recently deleted pages and noticed that this deletion seems to be based on lack of information that, though tricky to find due to surname, does exist. The following links offer proof of award-winning achievements via respected websites, including IMDB, MTV and respected film events.

(listed as Director on MTV website for work currently airing on network) (confirms awards and history in movie industry) (significant directing, producing credits including Coldplay, Outer Limits, Wolf Lake) (listed as a keynote speaker at an industry event) (listed as a represented director at a major director's agency)

May I petition for the re-listing of this page? I think this information is better available than not. If re-listed I will add these reference links to the article.

Jimdussier (talk) 21:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Jim