User talk:107.15.192.226: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 629331907 by Winkelvi (talk) Not edit warring any more than you.
Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Melissa McCarthy. (TW)
Line 28: Line 28:
Copy/paste:
Copy/paste:
:The sourced statement has since been removed for some reason (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kevin_Bacon&oldid=616409942 includes his sourced quote about his lack of belief in God). So I added the category in accordance with the article as it was then. He's rather well known to be an atheist, so if you require me to add a new source or put the old source back in, shouldn't be a problem. [[User:Karin Anker|Karin Anker]] ([[User talk:Karin Anker|talk]]) 01:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
:The sourced statement has since been removed for some reason (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kevin_Bacon&oldid=616409942 includes his sourced quote about his lack of belief in God). So I added the category in accordance with the article as it was then. He's rather well known to be an atheist, so if you require me to add a new source or put the old source back in, shouldn't be a problem. [[User:Karin Anker|Karin Anker]] ([[User talk:Karin Anker|talk]]) 01:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

== October 2014 ==
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Melissa McCarthy]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">[[User:Winkelvi|WV]]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">[[User_talk:Winkelvi|✉]] [[Special:Contributions/Winkelv|✓]]</span> 18:24, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->

Revision as of 18:24, 12 October 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (107.15.192.226) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Musdan77 (talk) 22:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Not normalized"

Still fighting the good fight, I see. I found an article about Metacritic's algorithm. Perhaps interesting, perhaps not. Anyway, it might be useful when pointing people toward what Metacritic does. Looks more-or-less like a weighted average with some secret tweaks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:17, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Correcting Metacritic explanation

Instead of removing any explanation of what Metacritic scores mean, I would suggest using corrected wording such as

At Metacritic, which assigns a weighted average score out of 100 to reviews from mainstream critics, the film received an average score of 49 based on 37 reviews.

as suggested by Erik at WT:Manual of Style/Film/Archive 6#Metacritic's so-called "normalized" scores. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 17:47, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Bacon thing, in case you lost track of my talk page

Copy/paste:

The sourced statement has since been removed for some reason (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kevin_Bacon&oldid=616409942 includes his sourced quote about his lack of belief in God). So I added the category in accordance with the article as it was then. He's rather well known to be an atheist, so if you require me to add a new source or put the old source back in, shouldn't be a problem. Karin Anker (talk) 01:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Melissa McCarthy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- WV 18:24, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.