User talk:207.114.206.48

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 207.114.206.48 (talk) at 05:41, 1 February 2009 (→‎Aragon High School: secondary response). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, 207.114.206.48, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! —72.75.72.63 (talk · contribs) 13:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits made on January 13, 2008 (UTC) to Buffalo Soldier

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Buffalo Soldier, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. 72.75.72.63 (talk) 13:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response to edits of Buffalo Soldiers

There is citings of these these two regiments are clearly stated later on in the article in the Korean War Section. I don't see any reason why they should not be listed as regiments associated with the other regiments listed at the beginning of the article.

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Crestmoor High School has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Andy (talk) 13:44, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I should have added an explination. I had added a notable alumnist list, and had removed the footnote, and replaced it with a refrence list. --207.114.206.48 (talk) 13:59, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Asian American, you will be blocked from editing. Waterjuice (talk) 12:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
How was my edit, placing a flag regarding the usage of the word american, as I had asked for others opinion, considered racist?--207.114.206.48 (talk) 13:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter if there are citations, if there are no articles. Write the articles first and include the notability citations in that article. AnyPerson (talk) 05:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just because there is no article doesn't mean that the person(s) are not notable. I can understand removing the internal link, however, removing the persons all together shouldn't be done, unless you can point towards a wikipedia guideline that says otherwise.--207.114.206.48 (talk) 05:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BIO. AnyPerson (talk) 05:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive58#Clovis_High_School_.28Clovis.2C_California.29. AnyPerson (talk) 05:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I sincerely hope that you do not believe my edits are in good faith and that this is not a threat to block future edits. I have read the List guideline and the Notable guidelines, and it does state in the talk page, but not in the guideline itself, that the person should have a wikipedia article unless it is a list relating to nationality/ethnicity. However, that does not mean that the three people that you have chosen to delete, including who is one of only two servicemembers whom have died in Iraq from San Mateo County. As I do not have a wikipedia log in, I cannot make said wikipedia articles, but that in and of itself should not exclude the people from the list. Just because a guideline has been discussed in the guidelines talk section doesn't make it an actionable edit, as it is not in the guideline itself. --207.114.206.48 (talk) 05:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have asked for other people assistance regarding this editting conflict, and am trying to reach a consensus as to whether those three individuals should be included. Please see more in the talk page.--207.114.206.48 (talk) 05:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]