User talk:Arcticocean: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Still waiting on reply: new section |
question |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
So why cant you reply to what you didn't remove?? --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 17:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC) |
So why cant you reply to what you didn't remove?? --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 17:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
==Question== |
|||
I was wondering if this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikipedia_Signpost%2F2011-08-01%2FIn_the_news&action=historysubmit&diff=443227413&oldid=442964236] is a violation of my topic ban. It was reverted by one of the most "involved" editors in the whole Shakespeare authorship dispute, which I didn't think was proper, as I had asked an administrator to weigh in on whether the topic ban extended to the Signpost discussion of an off-wiki artcle [http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/education/wikipedias-shakespeare-problem]. Thanks, [[User:Smatprt|Smatprt]] ([[User talk:Smatprt|talk]]) 22:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:46, 5 August 2011
The Signpost: 01 August 2011
- In the news: Consensus of Wikipedia authors questioned about Shakespeare authorship; 10 biggest edit wars on Wikipedia; brief news
- Research interview: The Huggle Experiment: interview with the research team
- WikiProject report: Little Project, Big Heart — WikiProject Croatia
- Featured content: Featured pictures is back in town
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision submitted for one case
- Technology report: Developers descend on Haifa; wikitech-l discussions; brief news
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:06, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Still waiting on reply
When I first added my reply, you only removed the last part of it, not the main part as can be seen at the bottom here: [1]
So why cant you reply to what you didn't remove?? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 17:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Question
I was wondering if this edit [2] is a violation of my topic ban. It was reverted by one of the most "involved" editors in the whole Shakespeare authorship dispute, which I didn't think was proper, as I had asked an administrator to weigh in on whether the topic ban extended to the Signpost discussion of an off-wiki artcle [3]. Thanks, Smatprt (talk) 22:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)