User talk:Arcticocean: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
question
Line 37: Line 37:


So why cant you reply to what you didn't remove?? --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 17:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
So why cant you reply to what you didn't remove?? --[[User:Supreme Deliciousness|Supreme Deliciousness]] ([[User talk:Supreme Deliciousness|talk]]) 17:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

==Question==
I was wondering if this edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikipedia_Signpost%2F2011-08-01%2FIn_the_news&action=historysubmit&diff=443227413&oldid=442964236] is a violation of my topic ban. It was reverted by one of the most "involved" editors in the whole Shakespeare authorship dispute, which I didn't think was proper, as I had asked an administrator to weigh in on whether the topic ban extended to the Signpost discussion of an off-wiki artcle [http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/education/wikipedias-shakespeare-problem]. Thanks, [[User:Smatprt|Smatprt]] ([[User talk:Smatprt|talk]]) 22:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:46, 5 August 2011

User:AGK/Notice

Tools
Admin statistics
Action Count
Edits 43925
Edits+Deleted 54362
Pages deleted 3031
Revisions deleted 71
Logs/Events deleted 2
Pages restored 270
Pages protected 4173
Pages unprotected 103
Protections modified 3658
Users blocked 2348
Users reblocked 155
Users unblocked 158
User rights modified 119
Users created 59
Abuse filters modified 89
Mass messages sent 4
The logo of the Mediation Committee while it was active

The Mediation Committee was a panel of editors who resolved content disputes on Wikipedia articles by providing formal mediation. The Mediation Committee was established with the Arbitration Committee in 2003 by Jimmy Wales and was the last stage of content dispute resolution on the English Wikipedia. Mediation was entered into voluntarily by the parties to the dispute and did not result in binding resolutions. The Mediation Committee policy documented how the Mediation Committee, its mediators, and the formal mediation process operated. This policy was maintained by the Committee and was considered an authoritative codification of how Committee matters should be conducted.

After a substantial period of inactivity, the Mediation Committee was shut down by community consensus on 12 November 2018.

Archives

  • For a list of declined requests, go to Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Rejected cases.
  • Previous requests for mediation are indexed below. Please note that mediation often took place on the talk page; the latter box allows those pages to be searched.


Click 'show' to view an index of all archives

Closed mediation cases (accepted requests)

Rejected mediation request pages




RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 12:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

Still waiting on reply

When I first added my reply, you only removed the last part of it, not the main part as can be seen at the bottom here: [1]

So why cant you reply to what you didn't remove?? --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 17:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I was wondering if this edit [2] is a violation of my topic ban. It was reverted by one of the most "involved" editors in the whole Shakespeare authorship dispute, which I didn't think was proper, as I had asked an administrator to weigh in on whether the topic ban extended to the Signpost discussion of an off-wiki artcle [3]. Thanks, Smatprt (talk) 22:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]