User talk:Adam Carr

Copying your Citizendium articles

"When I write new articles at Citizendiuhttp://en.wikipedia.org/skins-1.5/common/images/button_sig.pngm, I will post a notice here, so that anyone can copy them across to Wikipedia if they wish."

By a strict interpretation of the GFDL, copying across one of your articles from Citizendium to Wikipedia would be a copyright violation, as the GFDL requires authorship attribution, and such a copying operation would wrongly attribute authorship to the copier. I suppose the copier might acknowledge you in the edit summary, but that would be rather messy. Perhaps this situation will prompt the developers to turn on the import facility. Meanwhile, it would be much less problematic if you contributed your articles yourself. Have you an ideological reason for not doing so? Hesperian 01:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's okay as long as they properly source where it's come from...presumably a link to the article on cz. That's what happens currently when people post public domain or GFDL articles taken from elsewhere. Of course, we'd rather have Adam here and doing it himself. :) Sarah 08:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adam. Thanks for the message. I don't have up-to-date contact details for you. I like Wikipedia and I enjoy making a contribution. Vic Victor 08:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

admin?

Hi Adam! I recognized that you've been joining Wikipedia since September 2003. Are you an administrator? Morris Munroe 08:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This information can be obtained from Special:Listusers. Hesperian 10:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links

Adam:

While looking up dead external links, I found a batch of them that seem to belong to you, leading to "Adam Carr's Electoral Archive"

You ought to check on that. --Calton | Talk 00:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All right, but since it's your restructured site, you're the one who knows where everything is, making you the logical candidate to replace the links. If you won't, I'll just remove them sometime in the near future as the simplest solution. --Calton | Talk 04:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reason

There was a good one for putting the alternative spelling in the first sentence of the 'su/soe' indonesian politicians articles - but I am not going to revert them - hope you feel happy about that. Satu Suro 02:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keeping the diff spelling within the first sentence rather than down into the article had been the intention, but if you enjoy that well Ill leave it at thatSatu Suro 09:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expletive!

Hi. I just noticed at User talk:Sarah Ewart that you're moving from Wikipedia to Citizendium. That is a great loss to Wikipedia. Thanks for all your contributions, especially your edits to articles about Australian politics. Best wishes, CWC(talk) 06:06, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely agree. Very sorry to see you go. —Nightstallion (?) 08:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFD 2006 Victorian election campaign

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Victorian election campaign. Grumpyyoungman01 04:01, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty please? the page is swamped with comments from inclusionists. Grumpyyoungman01 08:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CZ and WP

Hi Adam, thanks for your message. I completely understand why you've joined CZ and I agree with your views on the vandals, anons and nuts. The larger and more popular WP gets, the worse the problem with such editors is getting. I feel like I waste most of my time here dealing with such people. I've actually been considering joining CZ myself.
I would be happy to help with posting your articles here. It would probably be best if you were to put them in your WP userspace until CZ comes out of pilot testing as CZ's database can't be viewed by non-members at the moment. Sarah 12:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ac.malinovski.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Ac.malinovski.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Alex Spade 10:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Langer vote

Hi, I have created a page at Langer vote and by the looks of the history of Albert Langer and your user contruibs, I thought you might be interested. To be completely honest, politics and electoral science are not areas I am familier with and I would like another set of eyes on the Langer vote article. Can you help? Thanks Parasite 08:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Greece Newsletter - Issue VI (II) - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the WikiProject Greece newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link.

Thank you.--Yannismarou 18:18, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Wood

An ip has added this to the article "Wood is also an outspoken supporter of the indefinite detention without trial of Australian citizen David Hicks, who has been held in Guantanamo Bay for the past 5 years. Hicks, who has never been charged, has been abandoned by the Australian Government." Is there any evidence that he does support or is it just vandalism? Crested Penguin 00:45, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. Crested Penguin 03:24, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goebbels FAC

I have nominated Joseph Goebbels for Featured article candidate here. You might want to look and address some issues if taken up? Good work.--Pudeo (Talk) 00:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Tuolsleng5.JPG

An image that you uploaded, Image:Tuolsleng5.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 00:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Tuolsleng5.JPG # 2

I uploaded in the Commons' database this picture (changing its original name) taken by me from en:wikipedia, but I posted a wrong link to this one, and now I need the correct link (or the original file name). I remember that the photo was taken by you (as you can see in the Summary, which I pasted from the source-file), in the same time and place as the one quoted by LX in the previous discussion. Since the subject of theese photos is the same from two different perspectives, the one I uploaded has the identical copyright problem of the other one. If you think that I'm right, could you tell me what's the exact name of the file you uploaded on en:wikipedia, please? If I am wrong and the picture is not yours, excuse me, please. Thank you. Bye.—Devilslord (talk, contribs) 18:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia

I've sent you a message. Constanz - Talk 10:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]