User talk:Akshithmanya

Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Sanjay_Bhatia

Hi Iamfarzan, thank you for helping me with Andhra Pradesh Lokayukta article. I am a new user and still learning Wikipedia. I had developed another article on which I spent a lot of time, but unfortunately it got rejected and the admin had put it back on draft so I could improve it. I have improved it by implementing all suggestions made, but I now don't know how to submit it move it to main space. Can you please review it once and suggest me on this. Here is the link to the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sanjay_Bhatia_(administrator). Request your support in moving it to main space and improving it standards. thanking you again. Gardenkur (talk) 00:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

I'll need a moment to research the notability aspect of this topic; I was about to explain to Gardenkur that their draft has received a final rejection, but I'm suddenly unsure. I'll replace this message soon. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:47, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Gardenkur, if I understand the situation correctly, your draft should ideally not have been declined, and definitely not "rejected" permanently. I have informed the two reviewers about the situation and accepted the draft as a normal article. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:29, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Iamfarzan,

After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
• Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
• Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" is helpful.
• Rollback may never be used to edit war, which you'll notice to be surprisingly tempting in genuine content disputes. Please especially keep the three-revert rule in mind. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW. The most helpful essay I've ever seen is WP:DISCFAIL; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
• If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:OS and WP:EMERGENCY for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.
• Use common sense.

To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:52, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello Iamfarzan, can you please review my Draft? I have made a few changes and added more content. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:TeluguStop Thank you!

Draft

Hello Iamfarzan, could you please review the draft you previously commented on? Thanks a lot!

Hi Iamfarzan. I added section on crticisisms of consumer genetics and also took out some of the stuff that read like an instruction manual. Please let me know which other sections you had in mind for improvement, I have a pretty open schedule next week and thought I'd work some more on it. Yinwang888 (talk) 16:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, it's me again with that draft article. I've worked some more on it now, and also chatted with the helpful staff at help desk IRC. They recommend me to add a lot more references, which I did, and also expand the criticisms section. Of the 21 references now, almost 15 directly cover the article website, imputeme, and one of the new ones also in a more negative light (that Peck et al one). Could you please take a look again and give me some more feedback? Thanks! Yinwang888 (talk) 21:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

its not reference. the article reads like essay.Akevsharma (talk) 00:09, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

OK thank you for your feedback. I've worked some more with it now. One piece of feedback from the people at the help desk was to break up the text with info box and headers. Hopefully this way will read less like essay, and also more clear outlining of criticisms section, for a more balanced encyclopedia feel. What do you think? Yinwang888 (talk) 05:17, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Request on 12:18:48, 5 November 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Sponhour

• Sponhour (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Republic Stamping and Enameling (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi - I do not really understand your rejection of my Republic Stamping article which was based upon months of research and cites numerous newspaper stories from the era and draws upon a unique photo album taken by a worker at the plant. Can you specifically cite where it is lacking - I am a new contributor. The photo album mentioned in the article is currently being used as the basis for a museum exhibit in 2022.

Sponhour (talk) 12:18, 5 November 2021 (UTC)