User talk:Andrevan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Former administrator and bureaucrat
This user is American
This user has autoconfirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user is a member of the Mediation Committee on the English Wikipedia.
Trout this user
This user has been editing Wikipedia for at least twenty years.
This is a User page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Andrevan (talk | contribs) at 03:42, 13 January 2024 (→‎New pages: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.



Contentious topics awareness
Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement. Try to stay in the top three sections of this hierarchy.
Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

I finally got around to updating the article and moving it. Now we need to update the links to the old "blog" location: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Lawfare_(blog) -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 20:57, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there is an AutoWikiBrowser type tool that will allow you to do many at once, and somewhere there is a noticeboard or some user who can do that, I am not one of them, but I know it's not something you should attempt to do manually, when a script or bot can do it Andre🚐 21:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It just dawned on me that Lawfare (website) might be better. It's an online multimedia publication, and that just means it's a website with varied types of content. A short name is a nice thing. What do you think? Pinging Soibangla. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 21:56, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that might be better. I looked to see if Lawfare sells any bound material, but not that I can determine. Andre🚐 23:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll go ahead and fix that matter. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 00:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 00:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Awards for 2023

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

For over 100 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Dr vulpes! Andre🚐 02:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages

I noticed this in the latest Administrators Newsletter:

I wonder about that. For security and reader protection, shouldn't all unreviewed new pages automatically get a big banner at the top that declares the article is not yet reviewed or vetted? Readers should know. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 02:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. Practically speaking, anything egregious does generally get flagged pretty easily. The stuff that's hanging out in the queue needs a closer eye as it's not obviously a problem. Andre🚐 03:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
....that anyone knows about. There could be some pretty fringey stuff that sits there with Wikipedia's name on it. It should automatically get a tag that must be removed by a reviewer or experienced editor. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 03:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is certainly the case that hoaxes and bad articles exist, even new ones happening as we speak, but I don't have any solution to that. There are heavier implementations of flagged or reviewed revisions and pending changes. I'm not entirely sure where those are applied to, but they do exist. Wikipedia:Pending changes Andre🚐 03:42, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]