User talk:Anwar saadat

This talk page is an acid-test of Free Speech in Wikipedia. However, due to strong language, it may be unsuitable for virgins, pensioners and narcissists between the ages of 15 and 65.

My Voting Policies

• Candidate must pass the Diablo Test. No exceptions therein are recognised. This is the minimum not the ideal.
• If the candidate fails the Diablo Test, he would be deemed to be unfit for administering a online encyclopaedia. Vandal fighting and housekeeping are irrelevant for this purpose.
• Even if the candidate passes the Diablo Test, he would still be deemed to have failed if he does not expressly submit to the recall list

The Apprentice UK

Hello, Anwar saadat. Are you a fan of The Apprentice UK? I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject The Apprentice UK, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Apprentice UK and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! Dalejenkins 18:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

I just wanted to thank you for being neutral in the Aryan Invasion Theory page, and for asking for more discussion. I wouldn't mind altering the addition a little, but not to twist the meaning or compromise the integrity of it. This user dab and rudra seem to be supporting each other on pages concerning so-called Aryans, Hinduveta, Out of India Theory, Indigenous Aryans, etc. and seem to be trolling together, in these pages, with the same attitudes. Are there any Administrators who will actually stop this kind of behavior? All I'm asking is for transparency, since it is a multi-faceted hypothetical argument. Cosmos416 00:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Request

Hi! Though I often disagree with your points in several FACs, discussions etc, no one can deny the strength of some your points of views. Here is a request. Can you please visit the article Religion in India? The article was Indian collaboration of the week on last week, and received some major edits. Could you please see it and comment (on the article's talk page)? The article is not complete yet, and may need several edits. Please also have a look at the to-do list in the talk page. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

RE: "rvv"

I noticed that you, in part, removed your own comment/s with the edit summary "rvv," which made me chuckle. El_C 14:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Er... I was kinda frothing on my mouth when I sinned thus.Anwar

Unspecified source for Image:Iodine.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Iodine.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yonatan ^talk 01:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

What is the original map you based this one on? Yonatan ^talk 01:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Occurrence maps

It seems they were all based on this map, which doesn't seem to be in the public domain. You're more than welcome to re-create them based on a free source (world maps under a free license can be found here. I sadly had to delete them all but if you want, I can restore them for a period of 48 hours or so, so you can save copies on your computer in order to make your work on free versions of these maps easier. Yonatan ^talk 02:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

see also User talk:Yonatan#Occurrence maps. Femto 12:18, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

ok. Anwar 19:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

In the free map there is no Antarctica. I am upset. Its a evil imperial cosnpiracy against ethnic Antarcticans.Anwar 22:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

I have added a new map here with label inset. Anwar 23:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Repeated Sivakasi Box Office deletions

I'm curious: why do you keep deleting the same Box Office content from Sivakasi (film) over and over again? —  Jim Dunning  talk  :  19:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Bcoz its a fake data. I told him but he is a passionate Vijay fan and keeps reinserting the dodgy figures again. Anwar 19:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

How much of it is spurious? I spot checked some of the references and some seem okay. I don't care for the bullet list format, however. Also, would you please use Edit Summaries? It would prevent some of your revisions from being reverted if there was an explanation with them: both I and another editor assumed you were vandalizing the [[} article and reverted, not realizing you were editing in good faith. Thanks.

I think a response section in this article would be good, so I'll take a look at some of the info in the deleted section. Thanks. —  Jim Dunning  talk  :  22:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Also, I believe this user is a sockpuppet of User:Prin who made similar edits not so long ago to the same film articles of Vijay. Anwar 13:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

31-hours block

You have been blocked for edit-warring on Hinduism, Idolatory and other articles, as well as making personal attacks on religious lines. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 15:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)