User talk:ArtifexMayhem: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:ArtifexMayhem/Archive 3) (bot
→‎"Like": new section
Line 77: Line 77:
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page [[Wikipedia:WikiProject AfroCine/Months of African Cinema|here]]. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--[[User:Jamie Tubers|Jamie Tubers]] ([[User talk:Jamie Tubers#top|talk]]) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)}}
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page [[Wikipedia:WikiProject AfroCine/Months of African Cinema|here]]. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--[[User:Jamie Tubers|Jamie Tubers]] ([[User talk:Jamie Tubers#top|talk]]) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Jamie Tubers@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=MassMessage/Lists/AfroCine&oldid=19422985 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Jamie Tubers@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=MassMessage/Lists/AfroCine&oldid=19422985 -->

== "Like" ==

If I could hit "like" on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=966440288 this comment] a thousand times, I would. What does "assuming good faith" look like when someone determinedly denies even the most blatantly obvious racist context, and then attacks you for pointing it out? I guess it means invoking colossal ignorance and massive blind spots as the most charitable possible explanation?<p>It's not just the thread at Jimbo's talkpage; I'm separately hearing stuff like: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&diff=prev&oldid=966431506 "I disagree with MastCell's characterization of 'lynching' as a 'racially charged' word."] That's right: people are denying that the term "lynching" is racially charged. Sometimes I feel like I've accidentally wandered into forum filled with QAnon word salad, but no, I'm on Wikipedia... Where pointing out that 2 + 2 = 4 gets you pigeonholed as a raving far-left radical socialist. So thank you for being a voice of sanity and an ambassador from the real world. There is a cost to speaking up about this kind of stuff, especially in an environment like this where social capital is the only real currency, so thank you. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 18:43, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:43, 7 July 2020

Welcome!

Hello, ArtifexMayhem, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Links and stuff

Aristotle? Well, that's got to be the least controversial edit ever done to the article. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 04:34, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I figured I should put something down before I ripped out that unsourced, factually wrong, Hippocratic Oath bit of fucking insane propaganda and replaced it with reality. That will be more interesting :) Nice Marlin karma btw. ArtifexMayhem (talk) 05:45, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I was just coming here to thank you for catching that one.
Meanwhile, there's a bit of Leviticus or Deuteronomy that says, roughly, that if you beat a woman to death, you shall be put to death. (That happens a lot in those books.) However, if you beat her just enough that she has a miscarriage, you just have to give her husband some money. So much for the value of fetuses. I'll try to find some non-OR way to work it in after the forthcoming Hippocrates brouhaha. PhGustaf (talk) 04:53, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I also like this bit...."In the 20th century the Soviet Union (1919), Iceland (1935) and Sweden (1938)....legalize certain or all forms of abortion. In 1935 Nazi Germany..."
Can you find the two red herrings? ArtifexMayhem (talk) 06:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Poking around, I see that Judaism and abortion already quotes Exodus 21:22-23. Not sure whether that would fit in the top article, but I'll think about it. PhGustaf (talk) 06:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For scientifically explaining why WTC7 was not exploded due to bombs, thermite, or any variant thereof. Toa Nidhiki05 04:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks. Getting it into the articles will be the hard bit. Do you it's time the Collapse of 7 World Trade Center article? Again, thanks for the message. — ArtifexMayhem (talk) 05:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ArtifexMayhem. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Diversity winner
  • Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Like"

If I could hit "like" on this comment a thousand times, I would. What does "assuming good faith" look like when someone determinedly denies even the most blatantly obvious racist context, and then attacks you for pointing it out? I guess it means invoking colossal ignorance and massive blind spots as the most charitable possible explanation?

It's not just the thread at Jimbo's talkpage; I'm separately hearing stuff like: "I disagree with MastCell's characterization of 'lynching' as a 'racially charged' word." That's right: people are denying that the term "lynching" is racially charged. Sometimes I feel like I've accidentally wandered into forum filled with QAnon word salad, but no, I'm on Wikipedia... Where pointing out that 2 + 2 = 4 gets you pigeonholed as a raving far-left radical socialist. So thank you for being a voice of sanity and an ambassador from the real world. There is a cost to speaking up about this kind of stuff, especially in an environment like this where social capital is the only real currency, so thank you. MastCell Talk 18:43, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]