User talk:Black Kite: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 30: Line 30:
:: I'd like an admin's comment on this. Is weighing in at ANI discussions as an uninvolved editor problematic? [[User:Oldstone James|<span style="color:#9400D3"><sup>'''O̲L̲D̲S̲T̲O̲N̲E̲'''</sup></span>]][[user talk:Oldstone James|<span style="color:#696969"><sub>'''J̅A̅M̅E̅S̅'''</sub></span>]] 17:44, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
:: I'd like an admin's comment on this. Is weighing in at ANI discussions as an uninvolved editor problematic? [[User:Oldstone James|<span style="color:#9400D3"><sup>'''O̲L̲D̲S̲T̲O̲N̲E̲'''</sup></span>]][[user talk:Oldstone James|<span style="color:#696969"><sub>'''J̅A̅M̅E̅S̅'''</sub></span>]] 17:44, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
::: We've been to ANI (more than once), we've been to AE, we've tried multiple blocks, and every time you start editing again we end up with issues. There's only so many times we can do this before we assume that it is your editing that is the problem. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 18:53, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
::: We've been to ANI (more than once), we've been to AE, we've tried multiple blocks, and every time you start editing again we end up with issues. There's only so many times we can do this before we assume that it is your editing that is the problem. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 18:53, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
:::: Since spring last year (around 10 months ago), there've only been a couple of occasions on which I didn't follow BRD, almost all of which were cases such as reversions of clear misunderstanding and edits which had since gained consensus. Even the edits for which I recently got blocked did not in fact violate BRD save for one, which was a reversion of an obvious case of misunderstanding. Have you looked into the issue at hand or are you just basing this conclusion off the fact that I'm on ANI again? Speaking of which, I had been constructively editing for a whole year, and there weren't any problems with my editing (so it's not true that, every time that I'm editing, we end up with issues). This is in fact the first time that I had ended up in a place like ANI in an entire year, although you are free to take a look at the actual edits that led to my block and evaluate whether my editing was actually problematic. The blocks that I had received one year ago and earlier I had more than learnt from. I was a different editor then than I am now, which is reflected by the fact that all conflicts and content disputes which I have had in the past year were quickly resolved, without the need for edit-warring, which I would've reverted to, say, two years prior. [[User:Oldstone James|<span style="color:#9400D3"><sup>'''O̲L̲D̲S̲T̲O̲N̲E̲'''</sup></span>]][[user talk:Oldstone James|<span style="color:#696969"><sub>'''J̅A̅M̅E̅S̅'''</sub></span>]] 19:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:08, 17 February 2020




"Penis game" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Penis game. Since you had some involvement with the Penis game redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Greetings, Black Kite. With all due respect, I believe you are having a knee jerk reaction to my ANI response and I am interested to know which of my points you found to be incorrect. Everything I have said was demonstrably true and I have the ability to prove it. If my accusations have seemed ludicrous, it's because Eagles247's behaviour (particularly for an administrator) has been ludicrous.

His accusations against me are also weak, as I have already partially outlined, and I am currently working on a section at Comments and proposal by Darkknight2149 explaining what has been going on with the TTN situation. DarkKnight2149 13:09, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Net negative and indef ban

Hello. You have recently commented that I am a net negative for Wikipedia and that an indef ban for me is an appropriate sanction. Can you please explain 1) in what way I can improve my editing so that my contributions are a net positive and 2) what I have done in the past week in particular that led you to make such a conclusion? O̲L̲D̲S̲T̲O̲N̲E̲J̅A̅M̅E̅S̅ 17:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Yeah, quit being a "pot stirrer", like at 3RR/N all you do is drive by pot stirring, for one thing. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:36, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like an admin's comment on this. Is weighing in at ANI discussions as an uninvolved editor problematic? O̲L̲D̲S̲T̲O̲N̲E̲J̅A̅M̅E̅S̅ 17:44, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We've been to ANI (more than once), we've been to AE, we've tried multiple blocks, and every time you start editing again we end up with issues. There's only so many times we can do this before we assume that it is your editing that is the problem. Black Kite (talk) 18:53, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Since spring last year (around 10 months ago), there've only been a couple of occasions on which I didn't follow BRD, almost all of which were cases such as reversions of clear misunderstanding and edits which had since gained consensus. Even the edits for which I recently got blocked did not in fact violate BRD save for one, which was a reversion of an obvious case of misunderstanding. Have you looked into the issue at hand or are you just basing this conclusion off the fact that I'm on ANI again? Speaking of which, I had been constructively editing for a whole year, and there weren't any problems with my editing (so it's not true that, every time that I'm editing, we end up with issues). This is in fact the first time that I had ended up in a place like ANI in an entire year, although you are free to take a look at the actual edits that led to my block and evaluate whether my editing was actually problematic. The blocks that I had received one year ago and earlier I had more than learnt from. I was a different editor then than I am now, which is reflected by the fact that all conflicts and content disputes which I have had in the past year were quickly resolved, without the need for edit-warring, which I would've reverted to, say, two years prior. O̲L̲D̲S̲T̲O̲N̲E̲J̅A̅M̅E̅S̅ 19:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]