User talk:Bloodofox: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Bloodofox/Archive 2. (BOT) |
→WP:AE: new section |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
:Hello TeeVeeed and thank you. Here's to working out our differences and editing together in the future. [[User:Bloodofox|:bloodofox:]] ([[User talk:Bloodofox#top|talk]]) 22:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC) |
:Hello TeeVeeed and thank you. Here's to working out our differences and editing together in the future. [[User:Bloodofox|:bloodofox:]] ([[User talk:Bloodofox#top|talk]]) 22:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC) |
||
== WP:AE == |
|||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#bloodofox] |
|||
Revision as of 15:58, 10 November 2016
Template:Archive box collapsible
 Archives (Index) |
Letting you know ...
I gave Ginnungagap a good shake and removed the rewrite tag. You may want to check my work and possibly make the referencing scheme more consistent.
In the course of explaining Dronke's theory I ran into the fact that the Muspell and Múspell redirects had both been repointed to Muspilli. I wouldn't have located our article at Muspelheim, but that is definitely where those should point, however indubitable the etymological theory is, and I'm wondering whether there's anything else in that area that should be cleaned up. Yngvadottir (talk) 23:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
- Great, that's a big improvement. Yeah, that's one of those area that needs some disentangling. I rewrote a lot of our Norse cosmology articles but there's still a lot to do there. :bloodofox: (talk) 15:53, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding req.attention to edits. The thread is Editor on a mission: folkloristics vs cryptozoology. The discussion is about the topic Topic. Thank you.
TeeVeeed (talk) 13:50, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Nothing personal
Hi Bloodofox. I just wanted to say hello and let you know that I don't mean anything personal against you and I appreciate your graceful and attentive reaction to the problems that I have been having to your editing. Sending you this peace dove because you deserve it.
TeeVeeed (talk) 17:35, 28 October 2016 (UTC) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
- Hello TeeVeeed and thank you. Here's to working out our differences and editing together in the future. :bloodofox: (talk) 22:31, 28 October 2016 (UTC)