User talk:Butrint10morina: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Adjust subst content
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:


[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Twsabin|Twsabin]]. I noticed that you recently removed content from [[Kosovo Liberation Army]]&nbsp;without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. <!-- Template:uw-delete1 -->{{pb}}Therefore, your [[WP:BOLD|bold]] edit has been reverted. Per the [[WP:BRD|bold, revert, discuss cycle]], after a bold edit is reverted, the [[WP:STATUSQUO|status quo]] should remain while a discussion is started instead of [[WP:EW|edit-warring]], and the dispute should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] is formed to keep it or an alternate version.<!--Template:Uw-brd--> [[User talk:Twsabin|tw<sup>s</sup>abin]] 17:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Twsabin|Twsabin]]. I noticed that you recently removed content from [[Kosovo Liberation Army]]&nbsp;without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. <!-- Template:uw-delete1 -->{{pb}}Therefore, your [[WP:BOLD|bold]] edit has been reverted. Per the [[WP:BRD|bold, revert, discuss cycle]], after a bold edit is reverted, the [[WP:STATUSQUO|status quo]] should remain while a discussion is started instead of [[WP:EW|edit-warring]], and the dispute should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed [[WP:CONSENSUS|consensus]] is formed to keep it or an alternate version.<!--Template:Uw-brd--> [[User talk:Twsabin|tw<sup>s</sup>abin]] 17:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

== 3RR ==
{{3RR|Kosovo Liberation Army}}--[[User:Maleschreiber|Maleschreiber]] ([[User talk:Maleschreiber|talk]]) 19:40, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:40, 25 February 2022

Butrint10morina, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Butrint10morina! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bsoyka (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

February 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Twsabin. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kosovo Liberation Army without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary.

Therefore, your bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and the dispute should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it or an alternate version. twsabin 17:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Kosovo Liberation Army shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Maleschreiber (talk) 19:40, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]